Milo Rau's Moral Judgement on Trial: Theatremaker Cancels Peter Thiel Invitation
The Controversy Surrounding Milo Rau's Tribunal Format
Milo Rau, once the enfant terrible of continental European theatre, is facing criticism for cancelling the invitation to American tech billionaire Peter Thiel at the Wiener Festwochen theatre festival. Rau's decision to disinvite Thiel has sparked a debate about the role of theatre in politics and the limits of artistic expression.
The Event Details: Rau's Tribunal Format
Rau's tribunal format, which he invented almost two decades ago, has been a hallmark of his work. Rather than putting on plays or podium discussions, Rau organises 'tribunals' – featuring staged hearings, real witnesses, real arguments, and symbolic judgments handed down at the end. This format has been used in various productions, including the Moscow Trials and the Congo Tribunal.
The Data Analysis: Threats of Boycotts
- Rau faced threats of boycotts from several productions if Thiel were to attend.
- The Austrian weekly Falter called the fiasco a 'fiasco'.
- Many disagreed with Rau's decision to invite Thiel, citing his support for Donald Trump's political universe and far-right ideas.
The Impact Analysis: Rau's Moral Judgement on Trial
Rau's decision to cancel Thiel's invitation has raised questions about his own moral judgement and the role of theatre in politics. Some critics argue that Rau's format blurs the line between fiction and reality, while others see it as a powerful tool for critical thinking and debate.
The Prediction: Future of Rau's Tribunal Format
Despite the controversy, Rau's tribunal format is likely to continue to be a topic of debate in the theatre world. As Rau himself says, 'Theatres are not only reserved for art.' The question remains, however, how far Rau will push the boundaries of his format and what implications this will have for the theatre world.