Guardian Columnists Clash Over Brexit’s Legacy
Three Guardian columnists—Aditya Chakrabortty, Polly Toynbee and Simon Jenkins—reflect on the 2016 Brexit vote, its immediate chaos, the economic fallout and the ongoing debate about the UK’s future relationship with the EU.
The Vote: Firsthand Recollections of the 2016 Referendum
Aditya describes waking at 4 am, hearing about David Cameron’s resignation, and witnessing racist threats in east London. Polly recounts a Labour phone‑bank where callers demanded “our country back” and expressed fear of foreigners. Simon recalls being in Berlin at the time, noting that Brexit was “not just about Britain and Europe” but about the future of Europe itself.
Economic Toll: Estimated 6‑8% GDP Hit from Brexit
The columnists cite a study indicating a 6‑8% decline in UK GDP attributable to Brexit uncertainty, referencing the experience of a Bristol valve‑maker forced to navigate changing CE‑mark regulations.
Political Fallout: How Brexit Shaped UK Discourse and Extremism
Aditya argues that Brexit mainstreamed extremist rhetoric, with far‑right language entering Westminster. Polly points to polls showing public willingness to trade freedom of movement for easier trade, while still fearing “the wrong people” arriving after Brexit. Simon notes a shift from emotional rhetoric to technical debate over trade, student exchange and food barriers.
Future Paths: Debating Re‑Entry and Incremental EU Integration
Simon asks whether the UK should seek full re‑membership or pursue a “step‑by‑step” approach, re‑joining schemes like Erasmus. Polly hopes a new prime minister will drop red‑lines and negotiate pragmatically. Aditya warns that piecemeal legal alignment may appear anti‑democratic.
- Columnists: Aditya Chakrabortty, Polly Toynbee, Simon Jenkins
- Key topics: Brexit vote, economic impact, political rhetoric, EU re‑integration
- Date of original debate: 23 June 2026