Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Crispin Odey, a 67-year-old hedge fund tycoon, appeared in a London courtroom on the first day of a three-week trial to challenge the Financial Conduct Authority's (FCA) decision to ban him from the UK's financial services industry. The ban was imposed due to allegations of sexual harassment made by several women. Odey testified that he did not recall cornering a female employee after a boozy lunch and saying to her 'I could attack you now'. However, the employee's diary entry, dated January 24, 2020, confirmed the incident, stating: 'Comes back from boozy lunch and corners me in the corridor. Him: I could attack you now. Me: Please don’t. Him: You could sue me for that.' Odey admitted to having groped a colleague's breasts without her consent in 2005, which he attributed to being under sedatives after root canal treatment. He claimed the woman accepted his apology and continued to work for the firm for another eight years. The FCA alleges that Odey showed a 'lack of integrity' by attempting to frustrate an investigation into allegations of sexual harassment. Odey denied these allegations, stating that he had attempted to have the FCA rule on whether he was fit and proper first. Odey is also facing a £79m libel lawsuit against the Financial Times and civil personal injury claims by five women, including one who accused him of rape. The hearing continues.

The recent sanctions imposed by the Trump administration against a UN human rights expert have raised alarm bells about the state of free speech and the ability to criticize government policies without fear of retribution. The expert, Francesca Albanese, was appointed by the United Nations to monitor human rights in occupied Palestine. Her offense was recommending that the International Criminal Court (ICC) issue arrest warrants for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for war crimes committed in Gaza. The sanctions, which amount to a "civil death," have effectively silenced Albanese, preventing her from opening a bank account, selling her Washington DC house, or drawing a salary from American universities that employed her. This has had a ripple effect, causing fear among faculty and students on campuses who are now hesitant to criticize Israel's human rights record. The executive order signed by Trump threatens to criminally prosecute anyone who provides Albanese or other designated figures with "funds, goods, or services." This vague language has led to a Maine university canceling an academic conference where Albanese was to make an unpaid appearance via Zoom. The authors of the article, a group of North American university professors and human rights lawyers, argue that this has created a chilling effect on free speech, deterring people from expressing their views for fear of facing sanctions or arrest. They have filed a "friend-of-the-court" brief in support of a lawsuit filed by Albanese's husband and daughter against Trump's unconstitutional sanctions. The targeting of Albanese has significant implications beyond those focused on Israel's human rights record. It should concern anyone who believes in free speech and the ability to challenge those in power without fear of retribution. When a government claims the authority to police ideas, everyone's liberty is on the line.

England cricketer Ben Duckett has made a significant decision to pull out of the upcoming Indian Premier League (IPL) to focus on his career with the England Test team. Duckett was signed by Delhi Capitals at the IPL auction in December for a substantial £200,000, but he has now withdrawn from the tournament. The decision comes after a combination of a poor Ashes series, where he played all five Tests with a highest score of 42, and heavy travel following his reserve duties at the recent T20 World Cup. Duckett believes that playing for Nottinghamshire will help him regain his form and secure his place in the England team. “It was a very difficult decision, and I want to apologise to everyone at Delhi that I won’t be coming,” Duckett told the Telegraph. “I’ve spent a lot of time away from home in different places, and it felt like the best thing for me to do to be ready to play for England is to be here right now, at home, refreshing my mind and body.” Under IPL rules, players who withdraw from the tournament for reasons other than injury face a three-year ban. Duckett follows in the footsteps of Harry Brook, who also signed for Delhi in 2025 before pulling out to prioritise his England career. Duckett’s recent performances have been under scrutiny, particularly after a video of him drunk on a night out during the team’s mid-tour break in Noosa was published on social media. He has since apologised for the incident, acknowledging that it was unprofessional. The England team is currently under pressure to refresh its lineup after the Ashes defeat. While Duckett’s opening partner, Zak Crawley, may be the likelier to make way for a newcomer, Duckett has shown promise since his return to the Test team in 2022, averaging 42 with six centuries.

Surrender to It is a film that seems to have been made without regard for the clichés that have been established by similar movies in the past. Writer-director Tim Bryn Smith appears to have ignored the criticism that greeted films like Peter's Friends back in 1992, which featured a similar premise of actors reuniting.The story revolves around a group of former thespians who met at a drama workshop and are now reuniting for a hiking weekend. The cast includes Daemian Greaves, Melissa May Smith, Fletcher Graham, and Chantelle Lee, among others. However, their performances are marred by stiff gestural quality and amateur production values.The script, credited to Bryn Smith and Chris Wetton, feels disjointed and like it was cobbled together from improv exercises and random suggestions. The film tries to balance maudlin tones with comic subplots, but the result is a mess. One subplot involves a bereaved couple mourning their dead son, while another focuses on a movie star recovering from a scandal.The film's production values are also lacking, with scissorhand editing and poorly executed plot twists. Despite its flaws, Surrender to It will be available on digital platforms from 30 March.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo, a staggering number of children are being forced into mine work due to poverty, with many working in hazardous conditions to extract valuable minerals such as coltan, tin, and tungsten. The situation is particularly dire in the eastern Congolese city of Rubaya, where 15-year-old Mishiki Nshokano is one of the children who has been working in the mines for four years to support his family.Nshokano's story is a heart-wrenching example of the desperation that drives children to work in the mines. With his father passing away in a landslide at a mining site in 2022, Nshokano had to drop out of school to help his family survive. He now works as an artisanal miner, earning a meager $4 a day, which he sends home to his mother to help them get by.The DRC government has laws prohibiting child labor, but the informal mining sector remains largely unregulated. According to the United States Bureau of International Labor Affairs, the DRC has made minimal progress in eliminating the worst forms of child labor, with an estimated 40,000 children working in mines across the country.The situation in Rubaya is further complicated by violence between the Congolese army and various armed groups, including the Rwanda-backed M23 rebel group. The Congolese government has accused the M23 of using women and children for looting activities, but observers note that child miners have been an issue in eastern DRC long before the M23 occupied the area.As the DRC and the US sign strategic agreements to exchange minerals for security guarantees, concerns are growing about the human cost of mineral mining. The UK-based organization Global Witness has called for businesses and governments to consider the human impact of mineral mining, highlighting the need for greater accountability and regulation in the industry.

Senegal's football federation has strongly condemned the Confederation of African Football's (CAF) decision to revoke their Africa Cup of Nations (AFCON) title, labelling it 'unfair, unprecedented, and unacceptable'. The federation plans to appeal this decision to the Court of Arbitration for Sport in Lausanne.The controversy stems from Senegal's walk-off during the AFCON final on January 18, where they were protesting a penalty awarded against them. Despite returning to the pitch and winning the match 1-0 in extra time, CAF's Appeals Board ruled that Senegal contravened tournament regulations and forfeited the game, declaring Morocco as the winner.The Senegalese Football Federation expressed its discontent, stating that the decision 'casts a shadow over African football'. They argue that the referee's decision to continue the game despite the walk-off was in line with the Laws of the Game, which state that the referee's decision is final.Veteran coach Claude Le Roy also weighed in on the issue, suggesting that CAF has a history of flouting refereeing decisions. The appeal process is expected to scrutinize the Congolese referee Jean-Jacques Ndala's decision to continue the match.

The US Department of Justice has charged three people, including a co-founder of Super Micro Computer, with helping to smuggle at least $2.5 billion worth of US AI technology to China. The indictment alleges a complex scheme to send US-made servers through Taiwan to other countries in Southeast Asia, where they were swapped into unmarked boxes and sent on to China.The defendants, Yih-Shyan Liaw, Ruei-Tsang Chang, and Ting-Wei Sun, are accused of using fabricated documents and staged bogus equipment to pass audit inventories, and a pass-through company to conceal their misconduct and true clientele list.The US has had export restrictions on China for advanced AI chips since 2022. Nvidia, which dominates the market for AI chips, has stated that strict compliance with export laws is a top priority.Liaw, 71, was arrested in California and released on bail, while Sun, 44, a company contractor, was held for a bail hearing. Chang remains a fugitive. Super Micro's shares fell 8 percent in after-hours trading following the news.

Real Madrid will host Atletico Madrid at the Santiago Bernabeu on Sunday, March 22, in a highly anticipated La Liga match. The home side aims to stay in touch with league leaders Barcelona, who currently hold a four-point lead and face Rayo Vallecano earlier in the day. If Barcelona wins, Real Madrid will be seven points off the summit. Los Blancos are coming off a strong performance in the Champions League, where they defeated Manchester City 5-1 on aggregate in the last 16. Vinicius Junior scored twice in the second leg, helping his team progress to the quarterfinals. Atletico Madrid, on the other hand, are fourth in La Liga and have a game in hand over third-placed Villarreal. They are also into the last eight of the Champions League and will play Real Sociedad in the Copa del Rey final. Diego Simeone's side are seeking to cause an upset against their city rivals and avenge their 5-2 drubbing in the first league meeting in September. The two teams have a long and intense rivalry, with 242 meetings between them. Real Madrid have won 124 matches, while Atletico have won 60, and 58 games have ended in draws. Atletico are unbeaten in their last six league games against Real Madrid, with four of those games finishing in draws. In terms of team news, Kylian Mbappe is set to start for Real Madrid alongside Vinicius Junior, while goalkeeper Thibault Courtois will be out for about six weeks due to a muscle injury. Andriy Lunin will deputise in goal. For Atletico, goalkeeper Jan Oblak is a major doubt due to a hip problem, and Juan Musso is likely to start between the sticks.

The trial in San Francisco centers on a class-action lawsuit filed against Elon Musk, who is accused of engaging in a pattern of deceptive behavior that misled investors as he attempted to back out of his $44bn deal to buy Twitter, now known as X, in 2022.Musk's claims about the number of bots on Twitter were a key part of his argument for backing out of the deal. He testified that Twitter had a much higher number of fake and spam accounts than the 5 percent it disclosed in regulatory filings, claiming it was actually around 20 percent. However, Twitter's former CFO Ned Segal disputed this claim, saying the number was closer to 1 percent.The trial has significant implications for Musk, whose fortune is now estimated at $839bn. If the court rules in favor of the shareholders, Musk could be liable for damages. The case highlights the challenges of navigating complex financial deals and the importance of transparency in corporate transactions.Closing arguments are set to begin on Tuesday, with the jury instructed to consider the evidence presented during the trial. The case has been closely watched by investors and observers, who are eager to see how the court will rule on the matter.