Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The Australian government has accused major tech firms, including Meta, TikTok, and Google, of failing to comply with a landmark ban on under-16s using social media. The ban, which came into effect last December, aims to protect children from the potential harms of social media.A survey of 900 Australian parents found that around a third (31%) said their children still had one or more social media accounts after the ban, compared to 49% before the laws. Specifically, the survey revealed that 70% of under-16s who had accounts on Instagram, Snapchat, and TikTok before the ban maintained access.The eSafety Commission claimed that the technology being used by these companies, such as facial age estimation, was not effective enough. The commission alleged that the firms had lax guardrails which allowed teens to repeatedly attempt age verification until they were successful. 'None of this is impossible. None of this is even difficult for big tech who are innovative billion-dollar companies. What this update shows is unacceptable,' said Australia's communications minister, Anika Wells.The social media minimum age laws specify that Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat, Threads, TikTok, Twitch, X, YouTube, Kick, and Reddit are 'age-restricted platforms', banning under-16s from holding accounts and requiring those companies to take reasonable steps to prevent children from opening or holding accounts. The laws carry a maximum A$49.5m (US$33.9m, £25.7m) penalty.In response, Meta said it was committed to complying with the social media ban and working with eSafety and the government. The company highlighted the challenge of accurately determining age online, particularly at the age-16 boundary. 'The most effective, privacy-protective and consistent approach is to require robust age verification and parental approval at the app store and operating system level before a teen can download an app or create an account,' Meta stated.TikTok and Google were contacted for comment but did not respond by publication time. The government said in January that more than 4.7m social media accounts were deactivated, removed, or restricted in the first days after the ban came into effect.

Ultimately, the quality of the core product will define rugby's future, rather than viral social media clips or artificial additives. As the sport continues to evolve, it must find a way to reconcile its competing demands and forge a path that balances tradition with innovation and commercial appeal.

Digital violence is on the rise in Africa, driven by the rapid growth of internet access and high youth populations. Experts warn that this trend has severe consequences, including mental health problems, withdrawal from public and economic life, physical attacks, and femicide.In Africa, internet access is growing exponentially, with more than 70% of the population under 30. This has created a toxic online environment with dire real-life consequences. A study across five countries in sub-Saharan Africa found that 28% of women had experienced online violence. As internet access expands, this number is expected to rise.Primary targets include women in politics, human rights activists, journalists, and women with a public profile. 46% of female parliamentarians across 50 African countries have been the target of sexist attacks online, and 42% have received threats of death, rape, beating, or abduction, often through social media.Legislation and digital literacy are crucial in combating digital violence. Only 38% of people on the continent are internet users, and among women, the figure falls to 31%. Experts stress that platforms need to be accountable for the harm that is taking place on them and put user safety over profit.Examples of digital violence include doxing, deepfake abuse, sexual harassment, intimidation, and sextortion. These actions can lead to stalking, physical violence, and damage to reputation. Globally, nearly two in every five women will experience tech-facilitated violence, while 85% of women who are online have witnessed or encountered online abuse.Fewer than 40% of countries have laws protecting women from cyber harassment or cyber stalking, leaving 44% of the world’s women and girls – 1.8 billion – without access to legal protection. In Africa, about 17 countries have introduced legislation looking at cybercrime, but most do not acknowledge the gendered nature of abuse.

Tim Sweeney, the CEO of Epic Games, the company behind the popular online game Fortnite, has issued an apology after facing backlash for laying off an employee with terminal brain cancer. The layoff not only resulted in the loss of income for the employee's family but also meant they would lose their life insurance. The controversy began when Jenni Griffin, the wife of Mike Prinke, a laid-off employee, shared their story on social media. She revealed that her husband was fighting terminal brain cancer and that the layoff meant they would lose his life insurance. Griffin expressed her concerns about the financial burden they would face, including the cost of a funeral and burial. Sweeney responded to Griffin's post, apologizing for not recognizing the situation earlier and promising that Epic Games would solve the insurance issue for the family. He stated that the company would provide a solution to ensure the family receives the necessary support. Epic Games announced the mass layoffs on March 24, citing a downturn in Fortnite engagement and a need to make major cuts to keep the company funded. Sweeney justified the layoffs by saying that the company was spending significantly more than it was making. Affected employees were offered a severance package, including at least four months of base pay, along with other benefits tied to tenure at the company. The layoffs have sparked controversy, with many questioning the decision to let go of over 1,000 employees despite the company's annual profits of $4 billion. Fortnite is the world's fourth most-played PC game, and the company's financial situation has raised concerns about the impact of the layoffs on employees and their families. Griffin's post, which included a picture of her husband's brain scan, quickly went viral, prompting Sweeney to respond and offer support to the family. The incident has highlighted the human impact of corporate decisions and the need for companies to consider the well-being of their employees.

The tradwife phenomenon has taken the world by storm, with influencers like Hannah Neeleman and Nara Smith showcasing their seemingly perfect lives on social media. But beneath the surface of this curated world lies a complex web of gender politics and societal expectations.The term 'tradwife' was originally coined in online 'incel' forums, where men discussed their ideal vision of a wife who would manage the household, give birth to children, and submit to their partners' demands. However, the mainstream media coverage of tradwives has been largely feminized, with many articles written by women.The tradwife is often associated with a nostalgic vision of the 1950s housewife, but with a significant difference: she is not just a submissive figure, but also a consenting participant in her own submission. This distinction makes the tradwife a more complex and nuanced character than her predecessors.The rise of the tradwife has been linked to the decline of feminist resistance and the lack of a coherent symbol of feminist resistance. The article suggests that the tradwife is an advertisement for a curated performance of womanhood, with a link in bio for purchases, reminding women of their true purpose: serve, smile, procreate, and purchase.The tradwife phenomenon has also been tied to the childcare crisis and the wage gap, with many women feeling forced to leave the workforce due to caregiving responsibilities. The article argues that the purpose of the tradwife movement is not to empower women, but to remind them of their place in society and to encourage them to relent to their own disappearance.

Model Erin O'Connor has spoken out against Instagram's inconsistent application of its nudity policy after the platform repeatedly removed her pregnancy photos celebrating her heavily pregnant body.The photos, taken in 2014 when O'Connor was eight and a half months pregnant, were posted on Mother's Day but removed and reinstated multiple times by Instagram. O'Connor argues that the platform's guidelines are unclear and context-insensitive, leading to double standards in how women's bodies are represented online.O'Connor's post included two nude portraits: one where she touches her baby bump with a blissful expression, and another highlighting her pregnant belly. Despite Meta's assurances of 'freedom of expression,' the post was flagged as 'sensitive' and removed twice.O'Connor expressed her frustration with the process, stating, 'It feels inconceivable that a heavily pregnant naked woman could be perceived as offensive when she stands in her full power, her body at its most extraordinary, embodying its innate ability to grow, birth and sustain new life.'The incident has sparked a broader conversation about body positivity, pregnancy representation, and the need for clearer guidelines on social media platforms. O'Connor emphasized the importance of context-sensitive policies to prevent the mistaken removal of meaningful content.Meta has stated that its default response is to remove 'sexual imagery' to prevent non-consensual or underage content, but allows exceptions for 'real-world art and certain medical, educational, and awareness-raising content.'

Meta's attempt to shift the blame for a young user's mental health issues away from its platforms and onto her family and offline social problems has backfired in a landmark social media addiction trial. The company, parent of Facebook and Instagram, employed a aggressive defense strategy that included highlighting the plaintiff's complaints about her mother in her teenage text messages and personal writings.The jurors, however, were not convinced by Meta's arguments and decided 10-2 in favor of the plaintiffs, awarding $4.2m in damages from Meta and $1.8m from co-defendant YouTube. This verdict could set a precedent for thousands of similar trials already in the works against social media companies.Meta's defense strategy drew backlash from parental advocates, who argued that the company was attempting to shift the blame away from its own design choices and onto parents and users. "For the biggest tech executives, I want to say something: stop blaming the parents. It's on you," said Julianna Arnold, a co-founder of advocacy group Parents Rise!.The trial's outcome reflects a growing distrust of social media companies and their impact on society. A Pew Research Survey found that around 64% of US adults believe that social media platforms have a negative impact on the country, and around two-thirds of Americans have a negative view of Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg.The verdict has been celebrated by advocates for reining in big tech, who see it as a significant step towards holding social media companies accountable for their role in shaping societal harms. "This trial was proof that if you put CEOs like Mark Zuckerberg on the stand before a judge and jury of their peers, the tech industry's wanton disregard for people will be on full display," said Sacha Haworth, executive director of The Tech Oversight Project.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has expressed strong support for curbing addictive social media features that target children, stating that the government 'will have to act' to regulate these features. In an interview with the Sunday Mirror, Starmer emphasized that these features 'shouldn’t be permitted' and that the government is committed to taking action.The government's education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, also weighed in on the issue, stating that social media platforms are 'designed to keep you there' and that the government will closely examine how to tackle addictive features. The comments come amid a growing debate about the impact of social media on children's mental health and wellbeing.The UK government's consultation on social media regulation has garnered significant attention, with nearly 30,000 parents and children responding to the digital wellbeing consultation. The government is considering a range of options, including a ban on social media for under-16s, which has already been enacted in Australia.The move comes after a US court ruling found Meta and Google liable for a woman's childhood social media addiction, awarding $6m in damages. The companies plan to appeal the decision. The UK government's consultation will also examine the use of addictive algorithms and algorithmically driven content on social media platforms.As part of the consultation, hundreds of UK teenagers will trial social media bans, digital curfews, and time limits on apps as part of a government pilot. The government aims to introduce significant changes to regulate social media and protect children online.

French authorities have foiled a suspected terrorist attack targeting Bank of America's Paris headquarters after police detained one suspect who was allegedly attempting to ignite an explosive device outside the building.In a social media post on Saturday, Interior Minister Laurent Nunez said the swift intervention by police had 'thwarted a violent terrorist attack' in the French capital the previous night.The suspect was arrested at about 3:25am local time outside the bank's local headquarters in the city's 8th arrondissement as he tried to light a device consisting of a five-litre container filled with an unidentified liquid and an explosive charge made up of about 650 grams of powder.The National Terrorism Prosecution Office told the Reuters news agency the suspected offences included attempted destruction by fire or other dangerous means in connection with a 'terrorist plot', as well as the making, possession and transport of an incendiary or explosive device with intent to carry out dangerous damage.'Vigilance remains at a very high level,' said Nunez on X, thanking 'security and intelligence forces, who are fully mobilised under my authority' in what he called the 'current international context', seemingly with reference to the escalating situation in parts of the Middle East amid the US-Israeli war on Iran.