Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The Hidden Cost Excluding PhD Parents from Childcare SupportThe education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, has asked the Competition and Markets Authority to examine hidden childcare charges. At the same time, the Department for Education’s own eligibility criteria for the 30 hours of funded childcare leave a large group of doctoral researchers without support.Eligibility Rules That Bar PhD Stipend EarnersPhD students on a typical UK Research and Innovation‑funded course earn roughly £20,000 a year. Because their stipend does not meet the narrow definition of “income” used to qualify for the scheme, they are denied the benefit that most working families receive.Eligibility hinges on a technical income definition set by the Conservatives.The Department for Education suggested qualifying by adding 16 hours of part‑time work per week.£8,000 Gap and Income ThresholdsThe author estimates that a PhD‑parent family misses out on about £8,000 of childcare support over the eligible period. This shortfall represents a substantial portion of a household earning £20,000 annually.Funded childcare is intended for families with children under five, offering up to 30 hours per week.PhD stipends fall below the income threshold, despite the parents’ “working family” status.Consequences for Academic Talent and Family ChoicesWithout the support, many doctoral candidates face a dilemma between continuing their research and leaving the programme to seek paid employment. The loss of potential scientists and clinicians could weaken the UK’s research pipeline.Reduced diversity in higher‑education research staff.Potential brain‑drain as talented individuals seek more supportive environments abroad.Possible Policy Revisions Under a Labour AdministrationThe author argues that a future Labour government should broaden the definition of qualifying income and remove the “nerd tax”. A review by the CMA could pave the way for more inclusive criteria, aligning the scheme with its stated goal of supporting working families.Re‑evaluate income definitions to include stipend‑based earnings.Consider flexible work‑hour requirements that recognise doctoral research commitments.

Marilyn Monroe's Inner Circle Marilyn Monroe's life and legacy have been extensively documented, but her friendships with women are often overlooked. The article explores her relationships with those closest to her, revealing a more nuanced side to the iconic actress. Female Friendships Monroe had many female friends, including Amy Greene, the widow of photographer Milton Greene. Greene shared her home with Monroe for several years in the mid-1950s and remembers the scrutiny they faced: "Girlfriends would say, 'Are you out of your mind to have that woman in your house?' I'd say, 'What's wrong with you? There's nothing there. They're business partners!'" The Power of Platonic Relationships Monroe's friendships with women like Lauren Bacall and Betty Grable are well-documented, particularly in films like How to Marry a Millionaire and Gentlemen Prefer Blondes. Her relationship with Jane Russell, her co-star in Gentlemen Prefer Blondes, was particularly significant, with Russell recalling a day at the beach with close female friends: "[We] had wine, music and more talk by the fire … I thought of Marilyn. I wished I had her phone number, because I knew she belonged there, where we were all laughing about our problems." Male Friends and Collaborators While Monroe's relationships with men like John F. Kennedy have been widely reported, her platonic friendships with men like photographer Lawrence Schiller were also important to her. Schiller worked with Monroe on a nude photoshoot, one of the most scandalous of her career. A More Nuanced Legacy The article highlights the complexity of Monroe's relationships and challenges the notion that she was solely a sex symbol. Her friendships with women, in particular, reveal a more vulnerable and human side to her personality.

Piper Rockelle, a former child star turned adult content creator, announced a $2.9 million haul in her first day on OnlyFans, positioning her among the platform’s top 0.012 % earners and igniting fresh scrutiny of teen‑driven monetisation. From Child Star to OnlyFans Sensation: Rockelle’s $2.9 Million First-Day Earnings At exactly 18 years old, Rockelle launched her OnlyFans account on 1 January, following a TikTok‑wide countdown that teased the move. She now films from an Airbnb in the Hollywood Hills, surrounded by pastel décor and a menagerie of pets, while posting daily content that blends teenage aesthetics with adult‑oriented themes. Revenue Snapshot: $2.9 Million in 24 Hours and Projected $40 Million Year‑One $2.9 million earned within the first 24 hours, according to Rockelle’s statements. Business manager forecasts > $40 million in earnings during the first year. OnlyFans reports having paid $25 billion to creators since 2016, though individual figures remain unverifiable. Rockelle ranks in the top 0.012 % of earners on the platform. What Rockelle’s Rise Signals for Influencer Monetisation and Platform Regulation The case illustrates how legacy kid‑influencer networks—once built on YouTube “Squad” pranks and slime videos—are being repurposed for high‑ticket adult platforms. Legal battles, including a $1.85 million settlement over alleged abuse, have already forced many teen creators off ad‑revenue streams, pushing them toward subscription models that lack transparent earnings verification. Future Outlook: Sustainability of Teenage Creator Economies on Subscription Platforms While Rockelle’s earnings demonstrate the lucrative potential for young creators, the model raises questions about long‑term sustainability, mental‑health impacts, and regulatory oversight. As platforms like OnlyFans continue to attract teenage talent, policymakers and industry leaders may need to devise clearer age‑verification standards and revenue‑sharing safeguards to protect vulnerable influencers.

The Pothole Puzzle Britain's pothole problem is a complex issue that requires a long-term solution. According to Phill Wheat, a professor of transport econometrics at the University of Leeds, the "spiral" of pothole formation can be avoided if funding for road maintenance is increased. The Cost of Inaction Once holes and cracks start appearing in a road, they grow and proliferate quickly. Vehicle wheels act like jackhammers around every bump and dip. Once the surface starts breaking up and water loosens the lower layers of the road structure, the opportunity to dress or replace the surface soon passes, and rebuilding at much greater expense becomes unavoidable. A Strategy for Success Highway authorities need to prioritise and schedule all roads for resurfacing or rebuilding. That will significantly increase the funding requirement in coming years, but once the programme is well advanced, reactive repair costs will decline sharply. Highway authorities need to model cost projections to show central government that more funding now will save money in the longer term. Funding and Implementation At least some of the extra funding could be raised by local traffic authorities from levies on road users, utilities that dig up roads, and employers that provide staff parking. Taxes rarely win votes, but if they guaranteed better roads and pavements, and lower insurance premiums, people might grudgingly accept them. A Call to Action There must be no cutting corners when rebuilding roads: if they continue to deform under the weight of ever-heavier vehicles, we'll end up in a spiral again. A flexible maintenance strategy and interagency working are crucial to keeping up with repairs to our roads.

The Lead: This Week's Entertainment HighlightsThis week's entertainment landscape offers a diverse array of critically acclaimed shows and films, from hilarious comedies to chilling horror. Channel 4's "Make That Movie" stands out as one of the funniest shows of the year, while Netflix's "The Four Seasons" returns with a brilliant second season. Horror fans can explore the disturbing world of "Backrooms," while Marvel offers a stylish take with "Spider-Noir."TV Comedy Gold: Make That MovieChannel 4Summed up in a sentence Last One Laughing finalist delivers one of the funniest shows of the year, with this mockumentary about a director who makes awful films.What our reviewer said "So ostentatiously silly that it deserves to be paraded around the streets." Stuart HeritageRead the full reviewFurther reading "People are like: you're a crackpot": how Sam Campbell became comedy's oddball superstarNetflix Triumph: The Four Seasons ReturnsNetflixSummed up in a sentence Tina Fey triumphs again with the return of this comedy about a group of middle-aged friends who reunite during holidays throughout the year.What our reviewer said "Even more perspicacious, poignant and hilarious than the first." Chitra RamaswamyRead the full reviewMarvel's Stylish Take: Spider-NoirPrime VideoSummed up in a sentence In Marvel's witty homage to the hard-boiled films and fictions of the 40s – which can be watched in colour or black-and-white – Nicolas Cage plays Ben Reilly, who gave up being superhero "the Spider" five years ago.What our reviewer said "Everything is shot with style and confidence." Lucy ManganRead the full reviewFurther reading The life of PIs: the strange case of 2026's resurgence of hard-boiled detectivesHidden Gem: PoniesNow/Sky AtlanticSummed up in a sentence Emilia Clarke and Haley Lu Richardson have heaps of fun as two widows who become cold war spies in this espionage comedy-drama.What our reviewer said "It's a mashup of genres and tropes, but it is its own thing too – and an unexpected treat at that." Lucy ManganRead the full reviewHorror Innovation: BackroomsIn cinemas nowSummed up in a sentence A debut from 20-year-old director Kane Parsons that examines memory, reality and fear in an icily disturbing horror, in which Chiwetel Ejiofor accesses an infinite series of hidden rooms that all feel creepily askew.What our reviewer said "Backrooms progressively raises its game towards the big finish with jump scares, squirm scares and tiny shiver scares. There is real fascination in exploring this vast, invisible city state of fear." Peter BradshawRead the full reviewFurther reading Are you sitting uncomfortably? How Backrooms upended the horror movieMusic and Bromance: Power BalladIn cinemas nowSummed up in a sentence Nick Jonas and Paul Rudd star in a comedy of bromance and betrayal from Irish writer-director John Carney that brilliantly brings together Rudd's washed-up wedding singer and Jonas's insecure ex-boyband superstar.What our reviewer said "Power Ballad is about making it and dreaming big, about every busker never giving up on hopes of one day being mega. But as so often with Carney, it's about something else, usually left unacknowledged in movies about music or any sort of show business: the terrible binary of success and failure." Peter BradshawRead the full reviewUnexpected Pairing: TunerIn cinemas nowSummed up in a sentence Playing a piano tuner with super-sensitive hearing, Leo Woodall's relationship with Dustin Hoffman is a tender highlight in this safe-cracking thriller.What our reviewer said "What a pair they are; they are a real pleasure to watch in an easy, unforced drama that mixes romcom moments with a relaxed crime thriller. It's like the Safdie brothers in chill-out mode." Cath Clarke

The Masterpiece of John Woo The title of this 1990 John Woo extravaganza might lead the uninitiated to expect a chillingly focused, targeted assassination. Actually, there are innumerable bullets and innumerable heads in this over-the-top gonzo spectacle. It is a crime thriller, a wartime action film set in Vietnam, but it offers something other than the usual Hollywood perspective; it is a parable of greed comparable to The Treasure of the Sierra Madre, and even a kind of romantic melodrama. The Symbolic Bullet There is, however, one key bullet in a head, a literal bullet lodged in the skull of someone who achieves a macabre zombie-like semi-survival, the bullet being symbolic of the way violence takes root in the brain, dehumanising its victim. The final “boardroom” scene disclosing this image is toweringly mad and strange. Yet in this movie, as in so many other Woo films, we can see how the director counterintuitively uses sad music – harmonica, woodwind – over grisly, brutal action sequences, as if what he wants us to register is not the violence or the shock but just how poignantly futile and pathetic it all is. The Plot Unfolds The setting is – initially – late 60s Hong Kong; Tony Leung plays Ben, a young guy getting married to his sweetheart Jane (Fennie Yuen), and on hand are his buddies Frank (Jacky Cheung) and Paul (Waise Lee). This trio are involved in a gang war with a rival mob who corner Frank when he has gone to get cash from the local moneylender to pay for the wedding. The confrontation ends in violence and, simply to get away and avoid the heat – Woo has a cameo as a police inspector – the three guys accept a crooked job from a local gang boss smuggling contraband pharmaceuticals in Vietnam. The Climax In Saigon, all their plans explode in pure anarchy; they are at first arrested under suspicion of working for the Vietcong, then upgrade their strategy to cynical arms smuggling for the North Vietnamese, and stealing the gold belonging to the local wiseguy who was supposed to be distributing their drugs. They make contact with a worldly fixer called Luke (Simon Yam), who has a Catherine Deneuve poster in his apartment, and also gallantly undertake to rescue a Hong Kong singer Sally (Yolinda Yam), who has been trafficked to Vietnam to sell sex. They end up on the spectacular field of battle itself (with helicopters, explosions, burning villages), where Paul, increasingly obsessed with the gold, finds himself at a key moment at mortal risk of detection if he cannot keep the wounded Frank quiet, whose cries of pain might alert the enemy to their position. The Legacy It’s an extraordinary, uninhibited barnstormer from Woo, who takes us from regular, domestic crime to military chaos with confidence and sweep. One moment, in which someone stands in front of a tank, even appears to echo the Tiananmen Square protests. No one else could have made it. The Release Bullet in the Head is in UK cinemas from 1 June, and on 4K UHD and Blu-ray from 22 June.

Executive Overview of the Guardian’s New Playlist FeatureThe Guardian has launched a fresh Add to Playlist column, highlighting the duo Ear and a dozen standout tracks that span lo‑fi, IDM, and garage‑rock. The piece positions Ear’s “laptop twee” aesthetic as a touchstone for the week’s most inventive releases.Ear’s iPhone‑Recorded Debut and the Rise of Laptop TweeJonah Paz and Yaelle Avtan recorded their first track, Nerves, on an iPhone inside Bard College’s library. The song juxtaposes murmuring vocals, weightless strings, and a sudden bass synth, epitomising the laptop twee movement that blends whimsical lo‑fi textures with experimental electronics.Playlist Composition and Release DataThe Durutti Column – Liars – first album in 15 years, released 2026Cara Delevingne – Out of My Head – debut pop single, released May 2026Gilla Band – Giraffe – new track from Irish band’s latest albumFeeble Little Horse – Upside Down – featured on surprise album BitknotBlood Orange – Essex_Honey.mp3 – bonus track from album of the same nameEddy Current Suppression Ring – Bop – highlight from surprise Melbourne garage‑rock albumAnthony Calonico – Hillside – 80s‑futurist jazz ballad from Los Angeles artistThe playlist is embedded via Spotify, allowing instant streaming across platforms.Why Curated ‘Laptop Twee’ Playlists Matter to the Music LandscapeThe Guardian’s focus on Ear underscores a broader shift: listeners are gravitating toward niche, algorithm‑friendly collections that celebrate genre hybridity. By foregrounding artists who blend nostalgia with avant‑garde production, the column amplifies a market segment that thrives on streaming discoverability and cross‑regional collaboration (Hudson Valley, London, Melbourne, etc.).Looking Ahead: The Future of Curated, Genre‑Blurring PlaylistsAs streaming services refine recommendation engines, we can expect more editorially‑driven playlists that spotlight micro‑scenes like laptop twee. Artists will likely continue to experiment with low‑budget recording techniques (e.g., iPhone studios) while leveraging curated platforms to reach global audiences, reinforcing the symbiosis between DIY aesthetics and mainstream exposure.

The Filmmaker's Foray into Documentary Lucrecia Martel, the celebrated director of films like La Ciénaga and The Headless Woman, has expanded her creative horizons with Landmarks, a documentary that scrutinizes a murder trial with far-reaching implications. The film navigates the intricate dynamics between Indigenous communities and the descendants of colonists, set against the backdrop of Argentina's Tucumán province. The Case at the Heart of the Story The documentary centers on the tragic killing of Javier Chocobar, a 68-year-old member of the Indigenous Chuchagasta people. Chocobar was fatally shot during a confrontation with men claiming rights to mine the land. Martel weaves the grainy, shaky footage of the incident into her narrative, juxtaposing it with breathtaking drone shots that capture the vast, poetic landscapes. Exploring Themes of Land and Legacy Martel's concerns extend beyond aesthetics; she places people at the core of her story. Through interviews and personal stories, the film sheds light on Chocobar's life, his family, and the struggles of the Chuchagasta community. A particularly chilling aspect of the documentary reveals how the state and local landowners have attempted to erase the Chuchagasta people, claiming they became extinct in the 19th century. A Quiet yet Powerful Testimony Martel allows the subjects of her film to present their case with quiet dignity, steering clear of strident rhetoric. The documentary is described as beautiful yet occasionally soporific, with a stately pace that allows for deep reflection on the issues presented. What's Next for Landmarks Landmarks is set to screen at Bertha DocHouse in London starting from May 29. This documentary promises to be a significant cultural and cinematic event, offering viewers a chance to engage with pressing social issues through Martel's unique lens.

The Political Shift in Enfield's Housing PolicyEnfield council in north London has withdrawn from the government's new towns programme, in a significant blow to Labour's flagship housebuilding scheme. The move by the new minority Conservative-led administration could present one of the first tests of Rachel Reeves's planning reforms, designed to curb the use of judicial reviews against new infrastructure.The New Towns Project and Its SignificanceThe project to build 21,000 homes at Crews Hill and Chase Park on the northern fringes of London was selected in March for the new towns programme along with six other locations across England. The new towns scheme has been heralded by the housing and communities department as the most ambitious housebuilding project in England for half a century and is regarded as a significant step towards helping Labour achieve its goal of building 1.5m homes during this parliament.Local Opposition and Political ChangeThe withdrawal comes after significant local opposition to the Enfield plan to build homes, shops, schools and services such as doctors' surgeries on green belt land currently occupied by several garden centres and family-run businesses. Enfield council, which was previously run by Labour, had already devised a plan to build homes at Crews Hill and gave its backing to the new town proposal.However, Labour lost control of the council in the local elections earlier this month and on Wednesday evening Conservative councillor Alessandro Georgiou was elected leader of the authority's minority Tory administration. The Conservatives pledged during the election campaign to halt the new town development if they took control of the council.Economic and Environmental ConsiderationsOn Thursday, Georgiou sent a letter to the minister for housing and planning, Matthew Pennycook, informing him that the council no longer supported the proposals to develop land at Crews Hill and other parts of the borough's green belt. In his letter to the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG), Georgiou said the council would work with the government to deliver new homes and jobs in the borough, but would focus on brownfield sites and town centre regeneration.Enfield council owns just under a third (30%) of the land in the borough, while other land earmarked for the development belongs to private landowners. The majority of private landowners did not want to sell, according to Nina Barnes, owner of the Culver garden centre site at Crews Hill, close to the centre of the proposed new town development.Future Implications for Housing PolicyThe withdrawal of Enfield from the new towns programme could have wider implications for the government's housing strategy. Other locations in the programme may face similar local opposition, particularly when development plans involve green belt land. The government may need to reconsider its approach to engaging with local authorities and communities on major housing projects.An MHCLG spokesperson said: "Our landmark national new towns programme will restore the dream of homeownership for people across the country. We recently consulted with local people on the proposals and will respond in due course." This suggests the government may continue to push the programme forward despite Enfield's withdrawal, potentially leading to further political conflicts between central and local government.