Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

After a week‑long outage that crippled Canvas for millions of students worldwide, Instructure announced it had reached an agreement with the ransomware group ShinyHunters. While the company stopped short of confirming a payment, the deal raises fresh questions about the wisdom of paying extortionists to protect sensitive educational data. Instructure’s Agreement with ShinyHunters: What Actually Happened The attack began when the group exploited a vulnerability in Instructure’s “Free for Teacher” software, allowing them to deface login pages at institutions such as the University of Texas San Antonio. ShinyHunters threatened to leak 3.6 TB of data – student IDs, emails, names and messages from 9,000 schools and roughly 275 million students and staff – unless a ransom was paid. Instructure later said the stolen data had been “returned” and that it received “digital confirmation of data destruction” via shred logs, but it did not explicitly confirm a payment. Financial Stakes: Ransom Demands, Potential Payments, and Industry Benchmarks ShinyHunters initially demanded $10 million in ransom. Australian ransomware surveys show the average payment fell to $711,000 in 2025, down from $1.35 million the year before. According to a McGrathNicol report, 64 % of surveyed Australian firms had paid a ransom, and 81 % said they would be willing to do so. As of January 2026, 75 Australian businesses with turnovers of at least $3 million had paid ransoms, though the total amount remains undisclosed. Cyber‑security experts estimate that Instructure’s payout – if any – could be anywhere up to the $10 million demand, potentially reduced through negotiation. Policy and Business Implications: Why Paying Ransom Remains Controversial Governments in the UK, US and Australia advise against paying ransoms, arguing that non‑payment reduces the attractiveness of ransomware as a crime vector. In Australia, paying a designated attacker could breach the autonomous cyber‑sanctions law, exposing firms to prosecution on a case‑by‑case basis. Critics also note that payment does not guarantee data will not be leaked; attackers may still copy or sell the information after receiving money. Experts such as Darren Hopkins (McGrathNicol) and Luke Irwin (Aegis Cybersecurity) stress the “trust factor” – criminals must appear honest to receive payment, yet they remain untrustworthy. This paradox fuels boardroom debates about risk‑driven decision‑making versus investing in prevention and incident response capabilities. Looking Ahead: How Companies May Navigate Future Extortion Threats The Canvas case underscores the need for stronger cyber‑resilience strategies: regular vulnerability patching, robust backup architectures, and clear ransomware response playbooks. Insurers are tightening coverage terms, often requiring demonstrable mitigation measures before honoring ransom claims. Policymakers may also tighten reporting obligations and consider clearer prohibitions on ransom payments, especially for critical‑infrastructure providers like education platforms. Ultimately, firms will have to balance the immediate pressure to restore services against the long‑term cost of incentivising criminal enterprises. As ransomware groups refine their extortion tactics, the industry’s collective stance on paying – or refusing – will shape the next wave of cyber‑crime economics.

Rousey’s Lightning‑Fast Armbar Ends Carano’s ReturnOn May 16, 2026, former UFC champion Ronda Rousey reclaimed the spotlight by defeating veteran Gina Carano in a feather‑weight bout at the Intuit Dome, Inglewood, California. The fight lasted only 17 seconds, with Rousey securing an armbar that forced Carano to tap.Financial Stakes: Multi‑Million Paychecks for Both FightersBoth athletes were reportedly paid “several million dollars” by the streaming platform behind the event, underscoring the commercial pull of legacy female fighters. Rousey’s record improves to 13‑2‑0, marking her 10th submission win, while Carano returns with a 7‑2‑0 record after a 17‑year hiatus.Impact on Women’s MMA and the Streaming ModelThe bout demonstrates how legacy names can drive viewership for digital‑first fight promotions, potentially reshaping revenue models for women’s MMA. Rousey’s decisive victory may reinforce the narrative that elite talent remains dominant, while Carano’s high‑profile comeback, despite the loss, highlights the growing appetite for veteran storylines.Future Outlook for Rousey, Carano, and the SportRousey has stated the fight was a “one‑off” and hinted at focusing on family, suggesting this could be her final MMA appearance. Carano, meanwhile, left the cage expressing pride in her preparation and keeping the door open for future bouts. The event’s success could encourage more streaming services to invest in marquee match‑ups, further elevating women’s MMA on a global stage.

The Alleged Settlement There is growing concern that Donald Trump’s massive $10bn lawsuit against the Internal Revenue Service may soon be settled by his own administration – an unprecedented, self-dealing maneuver for a US president, in which billions of taxpayer dollars could be transferred to the president or his allies. The Terms of the Settlement Trump may agree to drop his lawsuit in exchange for the launch of a $1.7bn fund to compensate people he says were wrongfully targeted by the Biden administration, according to reports by ABC News and the New York Times. Among those eligible to receive compensation from the fund are more than 1,500 January 6 rioters. The treasury department’s Judgment Fund, a pool of taxpayer funds reserved to pay out court judgments and settlements, would allegedly become the vehicle for Trump’s self-styled victim compensation fund. The Lawsuit's Background Trump’s January lawsuit, in which he, along with two of his sons and the Trump family business, sued the government’s tax arm for $10bn dollars in damages for the leak of his personal tax returns to the New York Times and ProPublica during his first term. The Data Analysis If the case is settled for the full amount Trump is requesting, a $10bn payment would more than double his family’s net worth. The sum is equivalent to about two-thirds of the IRS’s total budget for the 2026 fiscal year, and would be five times greater than any other award paid by the treasury’s Judgment Fund from January 2020 to September 2025. The Impact Analysis The case is the latest example of how Trump has taken over the justice department – which typically operates at arm’s length from the White House – and deployed it for his own ends. He has used the agency to prosecute political rivals, and the acting attorney general, Todd Blanche, has shown a willingness to carry out Trump’s wishes. The Prediction Legal advocates say there’s a risk of a collusive settlement with the president, even though similar lawsuits have failed. “There’s no difference between Trump directing the IRS to pay his family billions of dollars to settle the case, versus telling the treasury secretary that he deserves a $10bn bonus because he claims to be the smartest president ever,” said Andrew Warren, the deputy legal director at the Democracy Defenders Fund.

The Final Day HeartbreakAnother final-day showdown, another final-day heartbreak for Hearts. The pain may have been spread over 61 years, but that won't make it any easier to bear for Hearts who, having been top for 250 days of the Scottish Premiership season, missed out on the title once again.There was, of course, a Celtic penalty for handball and a critical video assistant referee decision that went their way, but on this occasion, neither provided the controversy. That came instead from the confusion as the game was ended by a pitch invasion with 23 seconds plus whatever else the referee felt needed to be added to injury still to play.The Dramatic FinaleFor Martin O'Neill, the Celtic manager, this was a remarkable finale. At 74, he has his fourth Scottish title, and surely the most remarkable, achieved by winning the final eight games of the league season. That may become a double if Celtic can beat Dunfermline in the Scottish Cup final next week.Hearts had led the league for much of the season, but their hopes were crushed when Daizen Maeda squeezed in a goal with just four minutes remaining, putting Celtic in front. The late goal sealed Celtic's title retention and sent Hearts players and supporters into despair.The Historical ContextThis wasn't the first time Hearts have experienced final-day agony. In 1965, Kilmarnock beat them 2-0 at Tynecastle to take the title by 0.04 goal-difference. And in 1986, they went to Dundee on the final day needing a draw and lost 2-0 to a pair of Albert Kidd goals in the final seven minutes as Celtic took the title on goal difference.Whatever the outcome, this was a day that was going to live forever in the history of the club. Everybody will have their tale, whether they were among the 752 making up the official allocation at Celtic Park, or among the many thousands packing the bars of Edinburgh's Gorgie, or simply watching at home.The Fan ExperienceThere have been breakout stories, those of fans who remember Hearts' last league title, in 1960, experienced the two previous final-day agonies, and assumed they would never see their side even have a chance of winning the league again. The most notable, perhaps, has been the 73-year-old singer Colin Chisholm, who has become a feature over the past few weeks, leading communal singalongs of the Hearts Song.These are the days that give purpose to the drab 1-0 home defeats, to the freezing afternoons watching terrible football, to the erratic owners and grim relegations: there's enormous emotional debt to be paid for even the possibility of a high such as Saturday might have provided.The Future of Scottish FootballThat does raise the question of whether this is a one-off. Tony Bloom with his Jamestown Analytics data model has brought success to Brighton in England and to Union Saint-Gilloise in Belgium. Why should it not work again next season for Hearts?But then Celtic are unlikely to appoint Wilfried Nancy for a second time, or Rangers Russell Martin. That's the flip side of this season: well as Hearts have played, it's exposed just how poorly the Glaswegian giants are run, how their parochial wrangling has blinded them to developments elsewhere and left them exposed to just such a challenge.Hearts may not go away, but Celtic will not be this bad again. Hearts will hope, and Scottish football should hope, that this level of competitiveness can be sustained. Other clubs, perhaps, can draw encouragement that the big two are not quite invincible. Hearts have shown a way, and all of Scottish football should thank them for that.

The AI Boom’s Unchecked Data‑Center ExpansionArwa Mahdawi argues that the surge in artificial‑intelligence workloads is forcing data‑center construction onto every corner of the United States, creating a new form of infrastructural “discrimination” against nearby communities.Power‑Bill Shock: 76% Rise Linked to AI‑Hungry Facilities30 billion USD in retail rate increase requests by U.S. utilities in H1 2025.76% jump in power prices on the nation’s largest grid during Q1 2026, driven by data‑center demand (Bloomberg).Data centers now consume 6% of electricity in the UK and US; projected to exceed 14% of U.S. power demand by 2030.Community Harm and Growing Public OppositionBeyond cost, AI data centers generate noise, pollution, and water‑use conflicts—exemplified by a Georgia suburb that lost 30 million gallons of water to a nearby facility. A recent Gallup poll shows 7 in 10 Americans oppose new AI‑data‑center projects in their neighborhoods, preferring proximity to nuclear plants over data hubs.Legal Friction: Claims of Discriminatory Treatment and Personhood DebatesUniversity of Michigan’s $1.2 bn AI‑data‑center project in Ypsilanti faced a municipal moratorium on water and sewer services. The university responded by alleging the moratorium “unlawfully discriminates” against data centers. This mirrors broader corporate‑personhood precedents—from Citizens United (2010) to Hobby Lobby (2014) and 303 Creative (2023)—that have expanded rights for non‑human entities.Industry Leaders’ Dismissive StanceOpenAI CEO Sam Altman downplayed concerns, suggesting the world might eventually be “covered in data centers” or even placed in space. Venture capitalist Kevin O'Leary dismissed protestors as “paid agitators,” further inflaming public resentment.What Lies Ahead: Regulation, Grid Investment, and Rights ContentionIf current trends continue, policymakers will need to address three intertwined challenges:Grid resilience: Massive upgrades to accommodate AI‑driven load growth.Environmental justice: Safeguarding water, air quality, and noise levels for affected communities.Legal clarity: Determining whether data centers can claim personhood‑like protections or must remain subject to standard zoning and utility regulations.Without decisive action, the clash between AI’s economic promise and community well‑being could intensify, reshaping the future of U.S. infrastructure and corporate rights.

The Lead: Foreign Faces as a Marketing ShortcutIn China, a growing gig economy hires foreigners as white monkeys – paid actors who pose as customers, experts or executives to make domestic products appear globally endorsed. The practice, thriving on platforms like WeChat, operates in a legal grey zone, offering quick cash to expatriates while feeding a deep‑seated consumer preference for foreign‑linked brands. The Rise of ‘White Monkey’ Gigs in China’s Service SectorFirst documented in 2009 when Piers was seated at a village wedding to attract diners, the phenomenon now includes:Restaurant seat‑warmers and go‑go dancersForeign models for advertising campaignsFake CEOs and scientists at trade exposEnglish‑language teachers marketed as native speakersRecruiters post daily on WeChat, specifying ethnicity (“white American”, “Hispanic”, “black women”) to match product narratives, a practice that would breach China’s equality laws if posted publicly. Earnings and Pricing Disparities Across NationalitiesCompensation varies widely:Short‑term expo roles: 100‑200 yuan (£10‑£20) per dayChef‑look‑alike gigs: 2,000 yuan (£200) for a single eventFake CEO assignments: high‑end hotel stays and “very well” pay, often exceeding typical gig ratesNational origin influences rates: Western Europeans command premium fees, while Eastern Europeans such as Russians, Ukrainians and Belarusians are paid closer to local wages, sometimes two‑to‑three times less than their German counterparts. How Perceived Foreignness Shapes Chinese Consumer TrustThe practice taps into the cultural concept of mianzi (“face”), where foreign association signals quality and reliability. Historical scandals – notably the 2008 melamine milk crisis – eroded trust in domestic brands, prompting marketers to weaponise the “foreign look” as a shortcut to credibility. This bias fuels a market where even low‑skill foreigners can command higher prices simply by appearing non‑Chinese. Future of the White Monkey Market Amid Regulation and Geopolitical ShiftsRecent crackdowns on illegal employment for foreign students, with fines up to 20,000 yuan (£2,000) and detention, signal tighter enforcement. Simultaneously, an influx of Eastern European migrants is saturating the supply of potential white monkeys, pressuring wages downwards. As Chinese firms seek authentic international partnerships and digital verification tools improve, the reliance on superficial foreign façades may wane, but short‑term demand for quick credibility boosts is likely to persist in niche sectors.

The Crisis of Entry: Youth Unemployment at the London Job ShowThe recent London Job Show at Westfield White City served as a stark microcosm of the broader economic stagnation facing young professionals in the UK. While the event attracted hundreds of job seekers, the atmosphere was defined less by opportunity and more by the sheer volume of applicants competing for a shrinking pool of roles. This gathering highlighted a critical disconnect between the government's ambitious employment targets and the daily reality of young people struggling to secure their first foothold in the workforce.The London Job Show as a Barometer for Recruitment StrugglesThe event, which hosts employers ranging from the Metropolitan police to car valet services, underscores the desperation of the current job market. For many attendees, the fair represents a rare chance to bypass the digital noise of online applications and present themselves in person. However, the presence of hundreds of hopefuls at a single venue illustrates the saturation of the market, where even those with degrees and qualifications are finding themselves locked out of sectors they are qualified for.Demi Trowsdale (24) has been unemployed for four months despite sending 170 applications.Angel Simpson (18) noted that qualifications are often insufficient against the "experience" barrier.Harvey Barns (21) highlighted the issue of "ghost jobs" and the struggle to afford living costs on minimum wage.The Statistics of StagnationThe despair on the floor of Westfield White City is backed by alarming data regarding the UK's employment landscape. The crisis is disproportionately affecting the younger demographic, with 713,000 young people currently unemployed. This represents a youth unemployment rate of 15.8%, significantly outpacing the general unemployment rate of 4.9%. In London specifically, the rates are even more acute, reaching 24.6%, making the capital the hardest place in the UK for young jobseekers to find work.The Dehumanisation of RecruitmentA significant factor contributing to the frustration is the shift toward automated recruitment processes. Young jobseekers like Demi Trowsdale have expressed feeling "dehumanised" by the lack of individual feedback, noting that applications are often met with blanket rejections rather than constructive criticism. The reliance on AI screening tools means that candidates are often judged by buzzwords rather than potential, leaving them feeling invisible in a system that prioritizes efficiency over human connection.Beyond the £1bn Pledge: The Need for Structural ChangeWhile the UK government has pledged £1bn to create 200,000 new jobs for young people, experts argue that funding alone will not resolve the structural barriers. Laura-Jane Rawlings of Youth Employment UK emphasized that successful delivery requires high-quality support, paid work experience, and apprenticeships. She also pointed out that in London, specific barriers such as transport costs, housing pressures, and digital exclusion must be addressed to truly unlock employment opportunities for the next generation.

The Lead: Ritchie's Resilient Entertainment ValueWhile the actual quality might never threaten to float him above a three-star rating, I've grown an odd, outsized fondness for Guy Ritchie's recent run of solidly enjoyable lower-tier action films. Whether deadly serious (Wrath of Man), entirely unserious (Operation Fortune) or somewhere between the two (The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare), there's been a real snap to them, one that's usually missing from other recent films of that ilk.The Event Details: Ritchie's Craft in 'In the Grey'Ritchie is more deeply invested in the thought-through craft of making a B-movie than many of his peers and there's a smooth sensuousness to how he moves, each of them looking, feeling and sounding like films he genuinely cares about. But, against all considerable odds, In the Grey might well be Ritchie's most purely entertaining film for years. Sure, it's messy in moments and nonsensically plotted at others, but it's also an incredibly, consistently fun time.The Plot Premise: A Debt Recovery ThrillerIt's his first sole writing credit since 2019's The Gentleman and hinges on a nifty, unusual premise. Rachel (Eiza González, reteaming with Ritchie after Ministry) is a lawyer tasked with trying to retrieve unpaid debts from dangerous figures, working on behalf of similarly shadowy financial firms. Her latest target Salazar (Carlos Bardem) owes $1bn and he's already dispatched the last lawyer who tried to get it back for sharp-edged exec Bobby (Rosamund Pike, devouring her few scenes).The Cast Dynamics: Chemistry and CharacterHis film is a tightly edited game with each moving part as thrilling as the other, whether it's González sparring with Pike (the pair trained well in 2020's nasty comedy I Care a Lot) or Gyllenhaal and Cavill enjoying the homoerotic motions of their boys-with-their-toys preparation. Ritchie's films have long toyed with queerness and here, the sexual chemistry and undefined dynamic between the two men isn't played for mean-spirited gay panic humour, they are for all intents and purposes playing a gay couple.The Action Craft: Ritchie's Signature StyleRitchie, as one has to come to expect, is an expert chaos-constructer and the action, along with another booming, seat-vibrating score from Christopher Benstead, is all seriously exciting to watch. Suspension of disbelief is of course required with our leads emerging as unscathed as superheroes, while also remaining as perfectly styled as models, but I was far too wrapped up to care.The Commercial Challenges: A Pattern of Mishandled ReleasesIf only audiences, and the companies releasing them, felt the same. While Wrath of Man, a more marketable Jason Statham revenge thriller yet containing more grit than one would expect, managed to make enough money overseas, he's otherwise struggled to justify his unusually high budgets. Operation Fortune was renamed, resold and pushed around the schedule before misfiring at the box office while The Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare couldn't even make half of its budget back after another botched release.The Future Outlook: Ritchie's Enduring AppealI fear for the day Ritchie will stop getting funding for his zippy and sleek yet commercially mishandled and criminally underseen larks but for now, with two more in the can, I'll happily live in a time when the cheques are still being written. The ending is at first satisfying and then a little abrupt, roughly yanking us out of what had been a smooth summer sojourn, the dust the film had been gathering on the shelf suddenly getting in our eyes.In the Grey is out now in US and Australian cinemas with a UK date to be announced

Football Club Owner Faces Fraud Allegations from ParentsParents have accused James (also known as Jamie or Jay) Austin, owner of the girls' football club Red Star Lionesses, of taking more than £28,000 in payments for tournaments that did not happen, kits that did not arrive, and sessions with Women's Super League players that did not take place. The allegations come from more than 70 parents involved with the grassroots club, with claims being reviewed by Greater Manchester police and investigated by the Football Association, which has issued Austin with an interim suspension while that investigation continues.Allegations of Non-Existent Tournaments and Unpaid ServicesAustin is accused of having charged parents a total of about £8,500 for entry, travel and accommodation to the Paris International Cup, a tournament being hosted at Paris Saint-Germain's training ground in July. However, emails from tournament organisers show that Austin had only made a reservation for two teams on an entry-only package and did not book the accommodation and travel packages for which he charged parents. The teams' entry was cancelled after organisers did not receive payment, and Austin is alleged to have doctored an email from them before sharing it with parents.Additional allegations include charging £275 per player for a tournament at Manchester City's Etihad Stadium that never took place, with messages from City confirming no event was scheduled. Austin also allegedly charged £20 per player for entry to a tournament last month organised by the Celtic FC Foundation at a community centre in London which parents subsequently found out was free to enter.Financial Impact and Parental LossesParents have launched a GoFundMe to help cover the cost of sending a team to the tournament, as requests for refunds from Austin have not been met. While Austin claims to have refunded over £6,000 in the past five days, parents dispute this, with some having successfully made claims through their banks. One parent reported paying more than £1,400 to Austin, feeling "betrayed" and stating that "the impact this has had on both me and my daughter has been devastating."Former Liverpool player Yana Daniels also accused Austin of not paying in full for running a training event, claiming she is owed £420. Daniels also alleged that Austin readvertised the event with her this year without her knowledge or permission.Wider Implications for Grassroots FootballThe scandal has raised questions about oversight in grassroots football, particularly for girls' teams. Parents were attracted to RS Lionesses because of their lively social media presence and the opportunities the club appeared to present for girls to play in high-level games. However, many opportunities did not materialize despite parents being charged for them.One parent commented: "Jamie 'Jay' Austin is the cowardly culprit, but every organisation involved in this case has enabled the wider failure across the girls football pathway. What will it take for the game to change and finally meet the standards already in place within boys' football?"The FA has suspended RS Lionesses due to non-compliance with regulations, specifically for not having a welfare officer after the officer resigned. An FA spokesperson stated: "We take all allegations of potential misconduct very seriously and we will always take steps to report cases to the relevant authorities, including the police, where appropriate."Future Outlook for Red Star Lionesses and Youth FootballAustin has a history of fraud convictions, including a two-year jail term in 2012 for using fake notes at Royal Ascot. He was also convicted in 2008 for using his grandparents' identities to commit fraud. Despite this, Austin claims to have "rebuilt my life" and "for the past 15 years I have led a law-abiding life."The investigation by both police and the FA will determine whether criminal charges will be filed against Austin beyond his existing suspension. For the affected players and parents, the immediate priority is securing refunds and ensuring the girls can participate in the Paris International Cup through the GoFundMe initiative. The scandal may prompt increased scrutiny of financial practices within grassroots football clubs, particularly those with ambitious promises of high-level opportunities for young players.