Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The play 'In the Print' is a tense thriller that dramatizes the 1986-87 stand-off between Rupert Murdoch and Brenda Dean, general secretary of the print union Sogat. The play, written by Robert Khan and Tom Salinsky, explores the Wapping dispute, a pivotal moment in British industrial relations.The play's central plot revolves around Murdoch's attempt to reform newspaper production and the union's resistance to these changes. Murdoch's use of a fake newspaper, The London Post, to justify the relocation of his titles to a deunionized workforce in Wapping is a key element of the play.The production, briskly staged by Josh Roche, features strong performances from the cast, including Alan Cox as Murdoch, Claudia Jolly as Dean, and Russell Bentley as Kelvin MacKenzie, the then editor of the Sun. The play leaves audiences to decide whether Dean was outplayed by Murdoch or if militant trade unionism was already on the decline.The play is part of a series of stage dramatizations of Murdoch's life and career, including James Graham's Ink and Murdoch: The Final Interview. 'In the Print' offers a unique perspective on Murdoch's revolutionary approach to industrial relations and his impact on British conventions.

Digital violence is on the rise in Africa, driven by the rapid growth of internet access and high youth populations. Experts warn that this trend has severe consequences, including mental health problems, withdrawal from public and economic life, physical attacks, and femicide.In Africa, internet access is growing exponentially, with more than 70% of the population under 30. This has created a toxic online environment with dire real-life consequences. A study across five countries in sub-Saharan Africa found that 28% of women had experienced online violence. As internet access expands, this number is expected to rise.Primary targets include women in politics, human rights activists, journalists, and women with a public profile. 46% of female parliamentarians across 50 African countries have been the target of sexist attacks online, and 42% have received threats of death, rape, beating, or abduction, often through social media.Legislation and digital literacy are crucial in combating digital violence. Only 38% of people on the continent are internet users, and among women, the figure falls to 31%. Experts stress that platforms need to be accountable for the harm that is taking place on them and put user safety over profit.Examples of digital violence include doxing, deepfake abuse, sexual harassment, intimidation, and sextortion. These actions can lead to stalking, physical violence, and damage to reputation. Globally, nearly two in every five women will experience tech-facilitated violence, while 85% of women who are online have witnessed or encountered online abuse.Fewer than 40% of countries have laws protecting women from cyber harassment or cyber stalking, leaving 44% of the world’s women and girls – 1.8 billion – without access to legal protection. In Africa, about 17 countries have introduced legislation looking at cybercrime, but most do not acknowledge the gendered nature of abuse.

The UK vape industry is sounding the alarm about the proliferation of fake vapes on the market, which can pose serious health risks to users. These counterfeit devices are often sold in high street shops and can look identical to legitimate products, making them difficult to spot.According to the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA), around 5m illegal devices have been seized over the last three years, with a street value of £39m. These devices often lack safety features, such as circuit protection to prevent overheating, which can cause them to catch fire.John Dunne, head of the UKVIA, warns that fake vapes may cause damage to people's health as they have not undergone the same testing regime as legal devices. 'Where the packaging might look similar and the product itself may look similar, these companies may not have the same safety features built into the device, because the copycats tend to try and make the product as cheap as possible,' he says.So, how can you spot a fake vape? One of the key telltale signs is if the box does not have a UK distributor's address on it. Other signs include poor-quality packaging with low-resolution photos or labels, and missing nicotine warnings and ingredient lists. The device name or labelling may also be written in a foreign language.If you suspect that you have bought a fake vape, you can file a report through the UKVIA or contact your local Trading Standards office. You can also check whether a brand has been registered with the MHRA through its website.

The growing influence of political deepfakes is a pressing concern, as AI-generated content becomes increasingly sophisticated and accessible. Online content creators are not only building fake images and videos of prominent public figures but also fabricating people and using them in military contexts, which can make them money and serve as effective propaganda.According to experts, some of these online avatars are sexualized images of women wearing camouflage garb that have generated a significant audience and helped create an idealized image of political figures like Donald Trump, even if the viewer knows the content is not real. Daniel Schiff, an assistant professor of technology policy at Purdue University, notes that "we are blending the lines between political cartoons and reality," and that "a lot of people feel like these images or videos or the stories they convey, feel true."The amount of political deepfakes has increased dramatically in recent years, with over 1,000 English language social media posts featuring fake images or videos of prominent political figures and politically important social issues and events cataloged by the Governance and Responsible AI Lab (Grail) since the start of 2025. In contrast, the organization recorded 1,344 such incidents in the previous eight years combined.The uptick is largely due to improvements in generative AI technology, which has made it "trivially easy to generate a scene that looks pretty realistic and to place real individuals into scenes," according to Sam Gregory, executive director of Witness. The fake avatars, which mimic real ordinary people rather than known figures, are a different matter again.Researchers worry that things will only get worse, with the technology used to build AI-generated content like Jessica Foster potentially being used to produce "AI swarms" capable of "coordinating autonomously, infiltrating communities, and fabricating consensus efficiently." However, humans can still stop malicious actors from using AI to destabilize society by implementing technical standards for content provenance and authenticity and ensuring that technology companies label AI-generated content.

A recent investigation has revealed a sophisticated scam operation where individuals are paid to write fake Google reviews in exchange for cryptocurrency. The scam, which was discovered on Telegram, involved recruiters posing as representatives of legitimate companies, offering individuals up to $800 per day to write fake reviews for various businesses, including hotels and restaurants. The scammers used a division of labor approach, with different individuals handling recruitment, coaching, and payment processing. The investigation found that the scammers were using Telegram channels to advertise their services and recruit new victims. These channels had thousands of subscribers and posted a steady stream of job offers, with payments starting at $5 per review. The scammers' main target was not just to create fake reviews but also to launder money and extract cash from their victims. They used cryptocurrencies to make payments, which were then laundered through a process called 'tumbling' to obscure their origin. The investigation also found that the scammers were using AI-generated images and stolen profiles to create fake identities. The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has estimated that fake reviews cause annual harm of between £50m to £312m to UK consumers. Google has taken steps to combat fake reviews, removing over 240m fake reviews since 2024 and restricting 900,000 accounts for violating policies.

The UK's Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has initiated investigations into five companies, including Autotrader and Just Eat, due to concerns about their handling of online reviews. The CMA is examining whether these companies have failed to adequately address fake and misleading reviews on their platforms. The investigations focus on several key issues: Autotrader and Feefo are being looked into for potentially excluding one-star reviews from being published; Dignity is under scrutiny for allegedly asking staff to write positive reviews; Just Eat is being investigated for possibly inflating star ratings; and Pasta Evangelists is accused of offering discounts in exchange for five-star reviews. CMA Chief Executive Sarah Cardell emphasized the importance of genuine reviews, stating, 'Fake reviews strike at the heart of consumer trust – with many of us worrying about misleading content when looking at reviews online.' The CMA has not yet reached any conclusions but aims to ensure that companies comply with UK consumer law. The investigations bring the total number of businesses under review to 14. If the CMA finds that a company has broken the law, it can enforce changes and impose fines of up to 10% of global turnover. The UK consumer body Which? has highlighted that 89% of people rely on reviews when making purchasing decisions, underscoring the significance of this issue. The CMA's new powers under the Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act allow it to address unfair practices related to online reviews without needing to go to court. This crackdown is part of a broader effort to protect consumers and maintain trust in online marketplaces.

European intelligence agencies have gathered evidence suggesting that Russia is on the verge of supplying drones to Iran for use in its ongoing conflict with the US and Israel. This development could significantly escalate tensions in the region.According to a senior European official, Russia has already been providing intelligence sharing with Tehran to help target US forces. The upcoming delivery of explosive-laden drones would be the first instance of lethal support from Russia to Iran since the start of the war.The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed a report by the Financial Times that western intelligence found Russia was close to completing a phased shipment of drones, medicine, and food to Iran. Drone deliveries could be completed by the middle of next week.In response, Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated, “There are a lot of fakes going around right now. One thing is true – we are continuing our dialogue with the Iranian leadership.”Russia and Iran have signed a strategic partnership agreement and Moscow has sent over 13 tonnes of medicine to Iran through Azerbaijan. Moscow's growing involvement could expand and escalate the conflict, which has been criticized for its ill-defined objectives and resulting geopolitical and economic chaos.European foreign ministers have expressed concern over Russia's support for Iran, with German foreign minister Johann Wadephul accusing Russia of helping Iran identify potential strike targets. “Putin cynically hopes that the escalation in the Middle East will divert our attention from his crimes in Ukraine,” he said.

The Coruna and DarkSword Threat For years, the prevailing narrative among iPhone security experts was that breaking through Apple's defenses was a rare, high-barrier event requiring significant resources. However, recent investigations by Google, iVerify, and Lookout have shattered this assumption. Researchers have documented broad-scale hacking campaigns utilizing two specific tools, Coruna and DarkSword, which have been used to target victims globally who are not running the latest software updates. Attack Vectors: Hackers are compromising legitimate websites and creating fake pages to deliver spyware. Key Actors: Involvement of Russian spies and Chinese cybercriminals. Tool Availability: The source code for these tools has leaked online, allowing anyone to launch attacks against older iPhones. The Two-Tier iPhone Security Landscape The discovery of Coruna and DarkSword highlights a critical data point in the current security ecosystem: the existence of two distinct classes of iPhone users. This bifurcation is driven by the introduction of Memory Integrity Enforcement in iOS 26, a feature designed to prevent memory corruption bugs—the very vulnerabilities exploited by DarkSword. Class A (Secure): Users on the latest iPhone 17 models running iOS 26 are protected by memory-safe code and Lockdown Mode, making them resistant to these specific memory-based hacks. Class B (Vulnerable): Users running iOS 18 or older versions remain exposed to memory corruption attacks, as these older systems lack the new safety enforcement layers. Challenging the 'Rare Hack' Myth The widespread use of these leaked tools suggests that spyware attacks are becoming more common and less exclusive. This shift is fueled by a thriving "second-hand" market for exploits, where brokers resell vulnerabilities before they are patched. Experts argue that the rarity of iPhone hacks has been overstated simply because they are rarely documented. As noted by Patrick Wardle, the baseline capability for such attacks is now accessible to a wider range of actors, moving beyond state-sponsored actors to include cybercriminals. The End of the 'Rare Hack' Era The future of mobile security appears to be one of continuous escalation. With the code for Coruna and DarkSword now public, the barrier to entry for launching attacks against older devices has lowered significantly. This indicates that memory-based exploits will continue to plague lagging users, and the market for exploit development will likely expand as brokers seek to monetize vulnerabilities before updates are applied.

Two prominent US lawmakers, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have introduced legislation to impose a moratorium on the construction of new AI data centres. The proposed pause aims to ensure that the rapidly advancing technology does not pose a threat to the 'future of humanity'. The lawmakers argue that current regulations are insufficient to address the potential risks associated with AI, including mass government surveillance and the proliferation of sexually explicit deepfakes.The legislation seeks to address concerns about the environmental impact of data centres, which consume huge amounts of water and electricity. It also aims to protect workers' livelihoods and civil liberties. Sanders emphasized that lawmakers are 'way behind' in understanding AI and that a moratorium is necessary to prevent a handful of billionaire Big Tech oligarchs from making decisions that could reshape the economy, democracy, and the future of humanity.Ocasio-Cortez stated that Congress has a moral obligation to stand with the American people and stop the expansion of data centres until a framework is in place to adequately address the existential harm AI poses to society. The proposed legislation comes amid a growing grassroots backlash against the rollout of data centres in communities across the US, with at least 36 data centres blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, disrupting $162bn in investment.However, the bill faces an uphill battle in the US Congress, where Republicans control both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Democratic Senator John Fetterman dismissed the proposed moratorium, calling it 'China First' and arguing that the US should build the emerging AI infrastructure while implementing appropriate guardrails.