Back to Headlines
Business
Apr 24, 2026
Analyzed by GPT OSS 120B

BP Chair Albert Manifold Slammed for Blocking Shareholder Climate Resolution

AI Summary
BP’s new chair Albert Manifold faced backlash after refusing to place a Follow This climate‑related resolution on the agenda of the 2026 AGM, prompting an 18% vote against his re‑election and highlighting governance tensions as the oil major pivots back to fossil fuels.

BP’s boardroom drama intensified when chair Albert Manifold blocked a climate‑focused shareholder proposal from Dutch investor group Follow This, sparking a rare rebuke from investors and a vote that saw 18% of shareholders oppose his re‑election.

Manifold’s Blockade of the Follow This Resolution

During the lead‑up to BP’s 2026 annual general meeting, Manifold declared the proposal “not valid” after legal counsel advised against it, despite the motion merely asking BP to outline how it would protect shareholder value if oil demand falls. The resolution was backed by investors managing roughly $1 trillion in assets.

Voting Outcomes Reveal Shareholder Discontent

  • 18% of votes were cast against Manifold’s re‑election – a strikingly low endorsement for a first‑time chair.
  • Only 47% supported BP’s own resolution to drop climate‑impact reporting requirements, well short of the 75% threshold needed.
  • Legal & General Investment Management publicly cited the blocked Follow This motion as a key reason for its “no” vote.

Governance Fallout for BP’s Boardroom

The heavy‑handed approach contrasts sharply with rival Shell, whose chair Andrew Mackenzie allowed a similar resolution to proceed and provided a detailed directors’ response. BP’s board still includes heavyweight non‑executives such as Amanda Blanc (Aviva) and former Barclays finance director Tushar Morzaria, raising questions about internal checks on the chair’s authority.

What Lies Ahead for BP’s Strategy and Shareholder Relations

BP’s “simpler, stronger, more valuable” strategy—pivoting back to oil and gas—may have majority shareholder support, but the recent governance clash suggests that future strategic shifts will need clearer dialogue with investors. Analysts predict that continued resistance to shareholder‑driven climate disclosures could pressure the board to adopt a more transparent, collaborative approach or risk further erosion of investor confidence.