Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The University of Southern California's Involvement The University of Southern California has been selling bodies donated for scientific research and education to the United States Navy. The Use of Donor Bodies for Military Training Some of these bodies are being used to train Israeli military surgical teams in Los Angeles – all without the donors’ consent. Investigative Reporting and Documentary Watch the AJ+ documentary here and read students’ reporting here. Episode Credits and Contributors Dena Takruri (@denatakruri), AJ+ senior presenter This episode was produced by Chloe K. Li with Spencer Cline, Catherine Nouhan, and our host, Malika Bilal. It was edited by Tamara Khandaker. Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Our video editors are Hisham Abu Salah and Mohannad al-Melhem. Alexandra Locke is The Take’s executive producer.

The Exceptional PerformanceEddie Nketia, an Australian sprinter who recently switched allegiance from New Zealand to Australia, achieved a remarkable 100m time of 9.74 seconds at the Big Ten Track and Field Championships in Nebraska. However, this impressive feat won't be recognized as a record due to a howling tailwind.The Event DetailsNketia accomplished the 100m/200m double for the University of Southern California. His performance in the 200m event was also notable, with a time of 20.03 seconds, recorded with a tailwind of 7.5m/s. This performance indicates his potential to be part of a strong Australian 4x100m relay team for future international competitions.The Data Analysis100m time: 9.74 seconds (with tailwind)200m time: 20.03 seconds (with a tailwind of 7.5m/s)The Impact AnalysisNketia's achievements suggest a bright future in track and field. His coach, Brenton Emanuel, believes Nketia has the potential to be one of the best sprinters, with a long career ahead of him. The changes made to his diet and physique are seen as key factors in his improving performance.The PredictionLooking ahead, Nketia aims to secure a legal personal best and compete at the highest level, including potentially representing Australia in international competitions such as the world championships and the Olympics. His progress and dedication indicate that he could challenge the world's best sprinters in the near future.

Martin Short's Heartfelt Revelation Martin Short has spoken for the first time about the death of his daughter, Katherine Short, saying her death has been “a nightmare for the family”. Katherine died in February aged 42, at her home in the Hollywood Hills. The County of Los Angeles Medical Examiner’s office confirmed she died by suicide. The Pain of Loss Speaking on CBS News Sunday Morning, the 76-year-old comedian and actor compared his daughter’s death with that of his wife, Nancy Dolman, who died of ovarian cancer in 2010 aged 58. “The understanding [is] that mental health and cancer, like my wife’s, are both diseases, and sometimes with diseases they are terminal,” Short said. A Desire to Raise Awareness Short said he had a “deep desire” to take “mental health out of the shadows” so people wouldn’t be “ashamed” of talking about it. “Not hiding from the word suicide, but accepting that this can be the last stage of an illness,” he said. A Year of Loss Short also spoke of losing several close friends and family in the past year, including his sister-in-law, his daughter and his friends Diane Keaton, Rob and Michele Reiner and Catherine O’Hara. “It’s staggering,” he said, adding: “You just have to breathe in, breathe out.” Katherine's Legacy Katherine was the eldest of three children adopted by Short and Dolman. She largely kept out of the spotlight, though she sometimes attended events and walked red carpets with her father. She received a bachelor’s degree in psychology and gender sexuality studies from New York University in 2006, as well as a master’s in social work from the University of Southern California in 2010, and went on to work in private practice as a licensed clinical social worker. A New Documentary Short spoke to CBS ahead of a new Netflix documentary film about his life titled Marty, Life Is Short, which premieres 12 May. The documentary touches on Short’s many experiences with loss early in life: his older brother David was killed in a car accident when Short was 12, and both of his parents died when he was still a teenager. Resources In the US, you can call or text the 988 Suicide & Crisis Lifeline at 988 or chat at 988lifeline.org. In the UK and Ireland, Samaritans can be contacted on freephone 116 123, or email [email protected] or [email protected]. In Australia, the crisis support service Lifeline is 13 11 14. Other international helplines can be found at befrienders.org

The LeadThe Trump administration has abruptly terminated all members of the National Science Board, the independent body responsible for overseeing the National Science Foundation (NSF). This unprecedented move eliminates a critical advisory group that has guided US science policy for over 70 years, raising immediate concerns about the future direction of federal research funding.The Dismissal of Science AdvisorsMembers of the National Science Board received an email on Friday sent from the Presidential Personnel Office "on behalf of President Donald J Trump" stating that their position was "terminated, effective immediately." Every member of the current 22-person board was let go, according to terminated member Yolanda Gil.The National Science Board was created in 1950 to advise the president and Congress on science and engineering policy, approve major funding awards, and guide NSF's future. It typically consists of 25 members appointed by the president who serve staggered, six-year terms. The fired scientists hail from academia and industry and specialize in areas including astronomy, maths, chemistry, and aerospace engineering."I wasn't entirely surprised, to be honest," dismissed board member Keivan Stassun said. Stassun, who works at Vanderbilt University, added that the decision was "enormously disappointing."The Foundation's Budget and SignificanceThe National Science Foundation plays a crucial role in funding scientific research across the United States. Last year, the Trump administration attempted to cut the science foundation's $9 billion budget by more than half, though Congress maintained NSF's funding. A similar slash is again on the table for the coming year.The NSF headquarters was also relocated to a smaller building. Last year, the US Department of Housing and Urban Development announced it would be moving into the NSF's former base in Alexandria, Virginia.Impact on Scientific Research and Innovation"I think this is one more indication of the sweeping changes that the administration has in mind for the NSF," said Gil, who works at the Information Sciences Institute of the University of Southern California.Maria Cantwell, the top Democrat on the Senate committee on commerce, science, and transportation, called the move "a dangerous attack on the institutions and expertise that drive American innovation and discovery."Without an advisory board in the way, Stassun noted, such cuts might be easier to execute. It could "eviscerate investments in fundamental research and in the training of the next generation of scientists and engineers for our nation," he warned.The board had been finalizing a report on the state of US science before being dismissed, raising questions about whether this report contained findings that contradicted administration priorities.Future Outlook for US Science PolicyThe National Science Foundation directed a request for comment to the White House. In a statement, the White House claimed that the powers given to the National Science Board when it was created might need to be updated. The science foundation's work "continues uninterrupted," the statement said.Scientists and policymakers are now concerned that the elimination of this independent oversight board could lead to more politically motivated decisions about research funding, potentially sidelining areas of science that don't align with current administration priorities.This move comes amid broader concerns about the direction of federal science policy, with many researchers warning that such actions could cause the United States to lose its competitive edge in scientific innovation and potentially drive talented researchers to other countries or sectors.