Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Washington has activated a naval blockade of Iran’s principal ports, marking the first large‑scale maritime restriction since the 2015 nuclear accord. The move, aimed at pressuring Tehran over regional activities, has raised concerns among shipping firms about disruptions to the vital Strait of Hormuz, through which roughly 20% of global oil shipments pass. Amid the escalation, President Donald Trump asserted that Iran wants a deal ‘very badly’ and that diplomatic avenues remain open. Trump’s remarks suggest a dual strategy of coercion paired with a willingness to negotiate, a stance that could influence upcoming talks in Geneva and affect global energy markets. Tehran, however, has condemned the blockade as piracy, accusing the United States of violating international law. The Iranian military’s statement framed the action as an unlawful seizure of sovereign waters, a narrative that resonates with a growing domestic backlash. In response, thousands of Iranians gathered in Tehran to protest the U.S. measures, chanting slogans against the blockade and demanding the restoration of free navigation in the Hormuz corridor. The demonstrations underscore the political risk for the Iranian regime, which must balance nationalist sentiment with economic pressures from restricted maritime trade. Analysts warn that the standoff could ripple through global markets, potentially inflating oil prices if shipping routes are further constrained. The situation also tests the resolve of allied nations, who must decide whether to support the U.S. posture or call for a diplomatic de‑escalation to safeguard the free flow of commerce through one of the world’s most strategic chokepoints.

The United States has imposed a naval blockade on Iranian ports, escalating tensions between the two countries. The blockade, announced by President Donald Trump, aims to restrict Iran's access to international trade and oil exports.Iran's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesperson, Esmaeil Baghaei, criticized the move, stating that it would only harm the international economy. "Can an illegal 'war of choice' be won through a 'revenge of choice' against the global economy?!" he posted on social media.Trump warned Iranian military ships against approaching the blockade zone, stating that they would be "immediately ELIMINATED" if they came close. The blockade, which came into effect on Monday, risks setting the stage for a major escalation that could fray a two-week ceasefire between the two countries.The United Kingdom Maritime Trade Operations (UKMTO) centre announced that the US blockade would apply "without distinction" to ships engaging with Iranian ports and oil terminals. The restrictions encompass the entirety of the Iranian coastline, including the ports and energy infrastructure.Iranian officials have accused the US of violating the truce by allowing Israel to continue to bomb and conduct a ground invasion in Lebanon. Pakistan, which mediated the ceasefire, had said all regional fronts – including Lebanon – were part of the deal.While Trump's move to blockade Iran's ports could hamper the already ailing Iranian economy, it is unlikely to loosen the Iranian grip on Hormuz or bring down energy prices. The average price of one gallon of petrol in the US is now more than $4.12, up from less than $3 before the war began.Iran has promised to defend its territorial waters, saying the naval siege amounts to "piracy". The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRG) also warned that if fighting were to resume, Iran would introduce new capabilities to the battlefield.

The Iranian military has strongly condemned the US plan to blockade its ports, calling it an act of piracy. The blockade, set to begin on Monday at 14:00 GMT, would restrict all vessels entering or departing Iranian ports. The Iranian army has warned that if its ports are threatened, no port in the Persian Gulf and Arabian Sea would be safe.The US Central Command has stated that the blockade would be enforced impartially against vessels of all nations entering or departing Iranian ports. However, the military would not impede vessels transiting the Strait of Hormuz to and from non-Iranian ports. The Strait of Hormuz is a critical route for global oil and gas shipments.Oil prices surged almost 8 percent on Monday, with both key WTI and Brent contracts topping $100 a barrel. The increase comes amid concerns over the potential impact of the blockade on global energy supplies.The move has been criticized by China, which urged Iran and the US not to reignite the war. Spain's Defence Minister Margarita Robles said the planned naval blockade 'makes no sense', while UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer stated that Britain would not join the US blockade.

Tucker Carlson, the former Fox News host, is set to launch his own publishing imprint, Tucker Carlson Books, in partnership with US-based publisher Skyhorse. The imprint aims to provide a platform for books that might otherwise be censored or shut down.Among the initial titles to be published are Russell Brand's How to Become a Christian in Seven Days, described as a "testimony and guide to a timeless, yet zeitgeist-capturing, grounded, yet psychedelic encounter with Christ." Brand is currently facing charges of rape, sexual assault, and indecent assault in the UK, to which he has pleaded not guilty.Another title set to be published is Milo Yiannopoulos's Ex Gay. Yiannopoulos, a controversial "alt-right" commentator, has previously been shunned by publishers due to his contentious views. His 2017 memoir, Dangerous, was canceled by Simon & Schuster after footage surfaced in which he made comments that appeared to condone sex between adult men and underage boys.Carlson, a former Trump supporter and promoter of right-wing conspiracy theories, was reportedly fired from Fox News in 2023. He soon launched his own media company, Tucker Carlson Network, and the imprint is being launched in partnership with this network.Skyhorse publisher Tony Lyons stated that the imprint will give "a platform to things that would, in many cases, be shut down, be censored, and be covered over by propaganda." Carlson emphasized that Lyons is "just looking for books that nobody else will publish."Skyhorse, which was launched in 2006, claims to be one of the fastest-growing independent book publishers in the US. Its previous publications include Woody Allen's memoir Apropos of Nothing and US Secretary of Health and anti-vaccine activist Robert F Kennedy Jr's The Real Anthony Fauci.

Hamas's armed wing has rejected calls for disarmament, stating that discussing the issue before Israel fully implements the first phase of the US-brokered ceasefire in Gaza amounts to an attempt to continue the genocide against Palestinians.In a televised statement, Hamas spokesman Abu Obeida said that raising the issue of weapons 'in a crude manner' would not be accepted. He emphasized that the disarmament demands are an overt attempt to continue the genocide against Palestinians, something Hamas will not accept under any circumstances.The issue of Hamas relinquishing its weapons is a major obstacle in talks to implement US President Donald Trump's 20-point plan for Gaza, aimed at ending Israel's war on the besieged territory. Since the US- and Qatar-brokered ceasefire took effect in October, more than 705 Palestinians have been killed in Israeli attacks, according to the Palestinian news agency Wafa.Hamas has told mediators it will not discuss disarmament without guarantees that Israel will completely withdraw from Gaza. Abu Obeida urged mediators to pressure Israel to fulfil its commitments under the first phase of the Trump plan before any discussion of the second phase can take place.Israel's war on Gaza, which began after Hamas-led attacks on southern Israel in October 2023, has killed more than 72,000 Palestinians and injured at least 172,000 others. Abu Obeida also addressed Israel's role in the US-Israel war on Iran, condemning it for launching strikes on Iran 'in the midst of the deception of negotiations, with full collusion and conspiracy with the United States'.

A federal judge has dismissed 10 out of 13 claims made by Blake Lively against director Justin Baldoni, including allegations of sexual harassment, conspiracy, and defamation. The lawsuit, which centers around the filming of 'It Ends With Us,' a domestic abuse drama where Lively and Baldoni starred as characters with intimate scenes, will proceed to trial next month on claims of a retaliatory campaign against Lively.Baldoni's lawyer, Bryan Freedman, described the defendants as 'very good people who have not engaged in this sexual harassment as alleged.' He expressed satisfaction with the court's ruling, stating it confirms what his legal team believed from the start.The judge's 152-page opinion emphasized that Lively's claims must be viewed in the context of the film's production, noting that creative artists need space to experiment within scripted scenes without fear of liability for sexual harassment. The court also determined Lively was working as an independent contractor, not an employee, which impacted her ability to bring sexual harassment claims.Lively's attorney, Mike Gottlieb, responded that the ruling was based on 'legal technicalities' and not an endorsement of the defendants' conduct. A trial is scheduled for May 18.

A federal judge has thrown out the majority of Blake Lively's claims against Justin Baldoni, her co-star and director of the domestic violence film It Ends With Us.In a court ruling on Thursday, Judge Lewis Liman dismissed 10 of the 13 claims in Lively's lawsuit against Baldoni, including claims of sexual harassment, conspiracy, and defamation. Only three claims will now be heard at trial: breach of contract, retaliation, and aiding and abetting in retaliation.The decision leaves Lively's case with a narrower focus, limited to her claims that Baldoni was behind a retaliatory campaign which shared and boosted negative stories about her online.“This case has always been and will remain focused on the devastating retaliation and the extraordinary steps the defendants took to destroy Blake Lively’s reputation because she stood up for safety on the set and that is the case that is going to trial,” Sigrid McCawley, an attorney for Lively, said in a statement.The case is set to go to trial in May after mediation failed last month.

Congo-Brazzaville authorities have taken a significant step in their pursuit of Jean-Guy Blaise Mayolas, the embattled president of the country's football federation, Fecofoot. An Interpol arrest warrant has been requested following his conviction for embezzling $1.1m in funds provided by FIFA.Mayolas, along with his wife and son, was sentenced to life imprisonment earlier this month for their roles in the embezzlement. The funds, part of FIFA's COVID-19 relief plan in February 2021, were intended to support the country's football community. However, the trio fled the country weeks before the hearing, with investigators suspecting they may be hiding in Cameroon or the Democratic Republic of the Congo.The embezzlement scandal involves $500,000 earmarked for the Congo women's team. According to allegations, only $20,000 of the allocated funds was actually paid out. Mayolas has denied all allegations, calling them a conspiracy. This is not the first time Mayolas has faced scrutiny; in 2015, he and other officials received six-month bans from FIFA for ethics violations related to gifts and benefits.The situation has led to significant repercussions for Congo's football community. The country was banned from international football due to third-party interference, resulting in the forfeiture of World Cup qualifiers against Tanzania and Zambia. While Congo has since been reinstated, the scandal continues to cast a shadow over the sport in the region.

A United States judge has ruled that he will not dismiss the drug-trafficking and weapons possession charges brought against former Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores.In a Thursday court hearing, Judge Alvin Hellerstein questioned whether the US government has the right to bar Venezuela from funding Maduro's legal expenses. The hearing was the first for Maduro and his wife since a brief January arraignment, where they pleaded not guilty.Maduro and Flores have sought to have the charges against them thrown out. Hellerstein declined to do so, but he pressed the prosecution on some of the issues Maduro's legal team raised in its petition to dismiss the case. Among them was a decision by the administration of US President Donald Trump to prevent the Venezuelan government from financing Maduro's defence.Federal prosecutors argued that national security reasons prevented the US from allowing such payments. They also pointed to ongoing sanctions against the Venezuelan government. But Hellerstein pushed back against that argument, noting that Trump had eased sanctions against Venezuela since Maduro's abduction on January 3. He also questioned how Maduro might pose a security threat while imprisoned in New York.“The defendant is here. Flores is here. They present no further national security threat,” said Hellerstein. “I see no abiding interest of national security on the right to defend themselves.”Hellerstein emphasised that, in the US, all criminal defendants have the right to a vigorous defence, as part of the US Constitution's Sixth Amendment. Maduro, who led Venezuela from 2013 to 2026, has been charged with four criminal counts, including “narco-terrorism” conspiracy, conspiracy to import cocaine, the possession of machine guns and the conspiracy to possess machine guns and other destructive devices.He and his wife were taken into US custody on January 3, after Trump launched an attack on Venezuela. The Trump administration has framed the military operation as a “law enforcement function”, but experts say it was widely considered illegal under international law, which protects local sovereignty.Trump himself weighed in on the proceedings during a Thursday US Cabinet meeting, hinting that further charges could be brought against Maduro. “He emptied his prisons in Venezuela, emptied his prisons into our country,” Trump said of Maduro, reiterating an unsubstantiated claim. “And I hope that charge will be brought at some point. Because that was a big charge that hasn’t been brought yet. It should be brought.”