Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Two prominent US lawmakers, Senator Bernie Sanders and House Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, have introduced legislation to impose a moratorium on the construction of new AI data centres. The proposed pause aims to ensure that the rapidly advancing technology does not pose a threat to the 'future of humanity'. The lawmakers argue that current regulations are insufficient to address the potential risks associated with AI, including mass government surveillance and the proliferation of sexually explicit deepfakes.The legislation seeks to address concerns about the environmental impact of data centres, which consume huge amounts of water and electricity. It also aims to protect workers' livelihoods and civil liberties. Sanders emphasized that lawmakers are 'way behind' in understanding AI and that a moratorium is necessary to prevent a handful of billionaire Big Tech oligarchs from making decisions that could reshape the economy, democracy, and the future of humanity.Ocasio-Cortez stated that Congress has a moral obligation to stand with the American people and stop the expansion of data centres until a framework is in place to adequately address the existential harm AI poses to society. The proposed legislation comes amid a growing grassroots backlash against the rollout of data centres in communities across the US, with at least 36 data centres blocked or delayed between May 2024 and June 2025, disrupting $162bn in investment.However, the bill faces an uphill battle in the US Congress, where Republicans control both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Democratic Senator John Fetterman dismissed the proposed moratorium, calling it 'China First' and arguing that the US should build the emerging AI infrastructure while implementing appropriate guardrails.

A recent jury verdict in California has held Meta and YouTube liable for the harm caused to a young woman, KGM, due to the addictive nature of their platforms. The plaintiff claimed that her social media use, which began at the age of six, led to injuries including body dysmorphia and thoughts of self-harm.The jury's decision marks a significant milestone in the ongoing debate about the impact of social media on young people. The verdict suggests that companies like Meta and YouTube, which have been accused of designing features to keep users engaged, can be held accountable for the harm caused by their platforms.Critics of the judgment argue that it could lead to a flood of lawsuits against social media companies, while others see it as a necessary step to protect young people from the potential dangers of social media. The verdict may also prompt regulatory changes and increased scrutiny of social media companies' practices.According to a report from Brown University, social media can be addictive due to its ability to activate the brain's reward system, releasing feel-good hormones such as dopamine. This can lead to a vicious cycle of use and addiction, particularly among young people who spend many hours a day on social media.In response to growing concerns, some countries have taken action to protect young people. Australia, for example, has banned children under 16 from using social media. In the US, there have been calls for social media companies to be required to put warning labels on their sites, but such proposals have yet to gain traction.The verdict is also significant given the close ties between the tech industry and the US administration. The appointment of Mark Zuckerberg to the president's council of advisers on science and technology has raised concerns about the influence of tech companies on policy decisions.Ultimately, the jury verdict sends a clear message to tech titans that they will be held accountable for the impact of their platforms on young people. As the debate about social media regulation continues, this verdict is likely to have far-reaching implications for the industry and for the protection of young people online.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced plans to address addictive features in social media platforms, signaling a potential regulatory shift following a significant US court ruling that held Meta and YouTube accountable for harms caused by their technology designs.The prime minister emphasized that the recent California court verdict reflects rising public expectations for more aggressive regulation of social media platforms. "I'm absolutely clear that we need to go further," Starmer stated, adding that "the status quo isn't good enough" in terms of protecting children online.Starmer specifically mentioned that the government is consulting about banning social media for under-16s and expressed strong commitment to addressing addictive features within social media platforms. These remarks come amid growing international pressure on tech companies to address the potential harms of their products on young users.In the landmark US case, a California jury found Meta and YouTube negligent for failing to provide adequate warnings about the potential dangers of their platforms. The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman who claimed she became addicted to social media during her childhood, was awarded $6 million (£4.5 million) in damages, with Meta responsible for 70% of the payment and YouTube covering the remainder.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex welcomed the verdict as "a reckoning" for tech companies, stating in a joint statement: "For too long, families have paid the price for platforms built with total disregard for the children they reach." They emphasized that "today, the truth has been heard and precedent has been set" regarding children's safety versus corporate profits.Both Google, which owns YouTube, and Meta have indicated they will challenge the decision. Google claimed the case "misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site," while Meta stated it "respectfully disagrees with the verdict and is evaluating our legal options." The verdict came after nine days of deliberation in the first lawsuit concerning social media's alleged harm to young people to reach trial.The ruling has resonated beyond the courtroom, with European Commission digital chief Henna Virkkunen noting that such cases send "a very clear message" to online platforms about the risks they pose. Campaigners for safer social media have celebrated the decision as a potential watershed moment in regulating platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X.The Molly Rose Foundation, established after the death of 14-year-old Molly Russell who was exposed to harmful content on Instagram, called for legislation that would make "safety and wellbeing the price for tech firms to pay for doing business in the UK." Thomas Lancaster, a computing expert at Imperial College London, emphasized that policies must be effectively enforced to protect those they're designed to safeguard.Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, declared that "the era of big tech invincibility is over," suggesting that the verdict validates concerns about tech platforms' impact on young people that have been raised for years.

Google has issued a warning that quantum computers could potentially break most existing encryption systems by 2029, posing a significant threat to current cryptographic standards. The tech giant is urging banks, governments, and technology providers to prepare for this emerging threat.In a blog post, Google stated that the encryption currently used to keep information confidential and secure could easily be broken by a large-scale quantum computer in the coming years. The company, owned by Alphabet, emphasized the need for post-quantum cryptography migration to protect sensitive data.While quantum computers are still a nascent technology, Google, Microsoft, and universities across the UK and the US are actively building systems that harness the physics of quantum mechanics to perform extremely sophisticated mathematical calculations. However, constructing a powerful quantum computer with hundreds of thousands or even millions of stable qubits remains a significant technological challenge.Leonie Mueck, formerly the chief product officer of Riverlane, a Cambridge-based quantum startup, noted that Google's statement does not necessarily mean a working quantum computer capable of breaking encryption will definitely exist by 2029. Most timelines for a cryptographically relevant quantum computer range from the 2030s to the 2050s.Despite this, governments and organizations are already preparing for the eventuality that data stored to today's encryption standards would be exposed when the technology sufficiently advances. The UK's cybersecurity agency, the National Cyber Security Centre, has urged organizations to guard their systems against quantum hackers by 2035.Google's timeline suggests that engineering teams across the technology industry should consider measures to protect sensitive data by migrating to more advanced encryption systems now. Certain kinds of attacks predicated on the future availability of quantum decryption – “store now, decrypt later” – may currently be being deployed across the field.

The escalating tensions between the US and Israel against Iran have created a lucrative market for arms manufacturers. As the conflict continues to intensify, defense companies are reaping significant benefits from the increased demand for military equipment and technology.The geopolitical landscape in the region remains volatile, with the US and Israel maintaining a strong stance against Iran. This has resulted in a surge in defense spending, with arms manufacturers capitalizing on the opportunity to supply the necessary equipment.The thriving arms industry is a testament to the enduring demand for military hardware and technology in the face of global conflicts. As tensions persist, it is likely that defense companies will continue to experience significant growth and profitability.

A drone attack has targeted Kuwait airport, resulting in a fire at a fuel tank. The incident occurred on March 25, 2026, at 05:06:12 GMT. Details about the attack, including the perpetrators and any casualties, are still under investigation. The attack on Kuwait airport underscores the increasing threat of drone technology being used for malicious purposes. Airports and critical infrastructure worldwide are enhancing their security measures to counter such threats. The Kuwaiti authorities have not released an official statement on the incident. Airport operations have been impacted, with potential delays and cancellations expected.

Anthropic, a leading artificial intelligence company, is set to face off against the US Pentagon in a San Francisco court over a ban that prevents the military from using its Claude AI model. The company refused to remove safety guardrails that prevent its AI from being used for fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance.The legal showdown began on Tuesday, with US District Judge Rita Lin presiding over the hearing. Anthropic argues that the Pentagon's move is an unprecedented and unlawful designation that violates freedom of speech protections and due process rights.The Pentagon-led ban was enacted after Anthropic refused to strip safety guardrails from its AI model. The company's designation as a national security supply chain risk prohibits anyone within the Defense Department or its contractors from using the technology.Legal experts believe that Anthropic is likely to prevail, pointing to a February 27 post on X in which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he is directing the DoD to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. The post also said that contractors, suppliers, or partners for the United States military are prohibited from commercial activity with Anthropic.The White House has pushed back on Anthropic's claims that government action violated free speech protections under the First Amendment of the US Constitution, saying the dispute stems from contract negotiations and national security concerns rather than retaliation.Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has penned a letter to Hegseth voicing her concerns, saying she is particularly concerned that the DoD is trying to strong-arm American companies into providing the Department with the tools to spy on American citizens and deploy fully autonomous weapons without adequate safeguards.

NASA has unveiled a significant shift in its moon and Mars strategy, allocating $20bn over the next seven years to construct a base on the moon's surface. This move comes as part of a broader overhaul of NASA's long-term Moon-to-Mars strategy, aimed at supporting long-term human presence on the lunar surface.NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman outlined the changes, which include increasing robotic missions to the moon and laying the groundwork for nuclear power on the lunar surface. The agency plans to repurpose some components of the Lunar Gateway station for use on the moon's surface instead of building the station in lunar orbit.The planned moon base will be supported by robotic missions that will help prepare the site, test technologies, and begin building infrastructure before astronauts return later this decade. Additionally, NASA disclosed plans to launch a spacecraft called Space Reactor 1 Freedom before the end of 2028, a mission designed to demonstrate nuclear electric propulsion in deep space on the way to Mars.The spacecraft will deliver helicopters on Mars, similar to the Ingenuity robotic test helicopter that flew with NASA's Perseverance rover. This step aims to move nuclear propulsion technology from laboratory testing to operational space missions. The changes to NASA's flagship Artemis programme are reshaping billions of dollars' worth of contracts and come as the United States faces growing competition from China, which is aiming to land astronauts on the moon by 2030.

A recent study has found that sperm deteriorates over time as it remains in the body, leading researchers to suggest that men who ejaculate more frequently may have better sperm quality.The study, which combined 115 human studies involving nearly 55,000 men and 56 studies on non-human species, found that the longer men went without sex, the more their sperm showed signs of DNA damage and oxidative stress, and the more tests rated the sperm as less viable and poorer swimmers.The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends men abstain from ejaculating for two to seven days before giving sperm for fertility tests or IVF, but the guidelines were designed to obtain the highest sperm count rather than prioritizing the best quality sperm.Dr. Krish Sanghvi, lead author of the study, said: "In men, the negative effects we found on sperm DNA damage and oxidative damage were large-ish, so we are confident that this is a biologically meaningful and important effect."The study's findings suggest that clinicians and couples should reconsider whether long abstinence is always good, as abstinence leads to deterioration in sperm quality.For couples trying to conceive naturally, a balance between quantity and quality needs to be struck, with abstaining for too long or too little potentially affecting sperm quality and quantity.Experts say that for assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments, it's having the freshest, most healthy sperm that is probably more important, and that the two to seven days abstinence rule may not be as crucial when IVF treatment is taking place.