Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

The latest film from Chloé Robichaud, 'Two Women', is a remake of the 1970 French-Canadian sex comedy of the same name. Unfortunately, it hasn't aged well, coming across as silly, clumsy, and dated in its modern retelling.The story follows two unsatisfied women, Florence (Karine Gonthier-Hyndman) and Violette (Laurence Leboeuf), who live next door to each other in a suburban condo development. Both are unhappy in their marriages – Violette's husband Benoît (Félix Moati) is often away, supposedly on business, but actually having affairs, while Florence has a bland, sexless relationship with David (Mani Soleymanlou). The two women form a friendship and, without explicitly planning it, begin having sex with men they invite into their homes for repairs or odd jobs while their partners are away.The film's sex scenes feel both cynical and naive, lacking the eroticism of softcore erotica and the plausibility of drama. The movie attempts to draw comparisons to the 'Confessions of a Window Cleaner' series but falls short. One notable moment includes a discussion on how Tinder promotes addiction rather than love, but such insightful moments are few and far between.Overall, 'Two Women' is a tiring and mediocre film that fails to deliver on its promise of a modern take on female desire and infidelity. It is set to release in UK cinemas from 3 April.

US President Donald Trump has stated that his 'preference would be to take the oil' in Iran, sparking concerns about the potential for a US invasion or occupation of the country. Iran is one of the world's biggest oil producers, holding around 24 percent of the Middle East's and 12 percent of the world's proven oil reserves, with about 157 billion barrels of proven crude oil.The Trump administration has threatened to target Iran's energy infrastructure, including oil wells, if Tehran does not reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which has been under a de facto Iranian blockade for weeks, triggering a global energy crisis. The US has also unveiled plans to prepare for limited ground operations in Iran, potentially including raids on Kharg Island and coastal sites near the Strait of Hormuz.Seizing Iranian oil would not be easy, as the US would have to occupy Iran's oil production sites and refineries, essentially occupying mainland Iran. However, if the US were to lift sanctions on Iranian oil after seizing it, it could lead to a flow of more Iranian oil into global markets, bringing down oil prices.The US-Israeli war on Iran has already sent global oil prices soaring, with benchmark Brent crude rising to more than 3 percent on Monday to $116 a barrel – the highest level in nearly two weeks. The oil price was about $65 per barrel before the war.In 2023, Iran's gross domestic product (GDP) was around $457.5bn, according to World Bank data. Iran's net oil export revenues were estimated at $53bn, equivalent to roughly 12 percent of Iran's GDP.This is not the first time the US has shown an interest in Iranian oil. In 1953, the government of Mohammad Mossadegh, Iran's first democratically elected prime minister, was toppled in a CIA-orchestrated coup after he nationalised the British-controlled firm Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC), the predecessor of modern-day BP.

South African Olympic champion Caster Semenya has expressed her strong disapproval of the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) decision to reinstate gender verification tests for the 2028 Los Angeles Games. Semenya, a two-time Olympic 800-metres champion, described the move as 'a disrespect for women'.The IOC's new policy, announced under President Kirsty Coventry, will limit eligibility for women's events to 'biological females' determined through a one-time SRY gene screening. This decision comes after the organization previously abandoned chromosomal sex testing in 1999 due to scientific concerns and athlete backlash.Semenya, who has been a symbol of the struggle for hyperandrogenic athletes' rights, emphasized that such measures 'cause harm' and are unnecessary. She pointed out that the policy seems to imply that women need to prove their worthiness to participate in sports, which she finds disrespectful.The IOC's policy shift aligns with US President Donald Trump's executive order banning transgender athletes from women's sports. Trump took credit for the IOC's decision, stating it was influenced by his order.The new policy follows a gender row at the 2024 Paris Olympics, where Algerian fighter Imane Khelif and Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan were allowed to compete despite failing eligibility tests. The IOC's decision aims to create a unified approach across all Olympic sports regarding athlete eligibility.

Caster Semenya, the South African two-time Olympic 800m champion, has expressed strong disapproval of the International Olympic Committee's (IOC) decision to reinstate sex verification tests for the 2028 Los Angeles Games. Semenya, who has been a symbol of the struggle for hyperandrogenic athletes, described the move as 'a disrespect for women'.The IOC's new policy, announced on Thursday, limits eligibility for female category events to biological females, determined through a one-time SRY gene screening. This move effectively bans transgender athletes and a large number of intersex athletes from women's sports.Semenya, who has male XY chromosomes, is a well-known athlete with a difference in sex development (DSD). She has been a vocal advocate for the rights of athletes like herself, who are often subjected to sex verification tests and scrutiny.The IOC's decision has been met with criticism from Semenya and others, who argue that such tests are ineffective and discriminatory. Semenya stated, 'For you as a woman, why will you be tested to prove that you fit? You know, it's like now we need to prove that we are worthy as women to take part in sports. That's a disrespect for women.'The new policy is set to be implemented starting with the 2028 Olympics, and will be carried out through a saliva sample, cheek swab, or blood sample. This move has sparked controversy, with many arguing that it undermines the rights and dignity of transgender and intersex athletes.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has come under fire for its new guidelines on transgender athletes, which have been criticized by over 100 human rights, sports, and scientific groups. The guidelines, announced on Friday, mandate genetic sex tests for all athletes competing in women's categories and impose blanket bans on people who identify as transgender, intersex, or with sex differences.The new policy has been deemed 'a blunt and discriminatory response that is not supported by science and violates international human rights law.' Professor Paula Gerber, an international human rights lawyer at Monash University, stated that 'mandatory genetic sex testing and rigid biological criteria as a condition for participation in the women's category violates fundamental and universal human rights … including the right to equality, non-discrimination, dignity, privacy, and bodily autonomy.'The guidelines have also been criticized for their potential impact on intersex athletes and women of color, who may be disproportionately targeted due to their appearance. Dr. Ada Cheung, a professor of endocrinology at the University of Melbourne, noted that 'the best available data … shows that transgender women receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy are not meaningfully different from cisgender women in key performance-related measures.'The Australian Olympic Committee (AOC) has expressed support for the new guidelines, with president Ian Chesterman stating that they provide 'clarity for elite female athletes who compete at the highest level and demonstrates a commitment to fairness, safety and integrity in Olympic competition.' However, Nikki Dryden, a human rights lawyer and former Olympic swimmer, argued that the guidelines 'will be unlawful in Australia' and 'create a culture where someone like a coach, an official, or even another parent, feels entitled to question whether your daughter 'looks female enough' to belong.'

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has announced a new eligibility policy for female category events at the Olympics, excluding transgender women athletes from competing in women's sports. This decision aligns with US President Donald Trump's executive order on sports, which aims to keep biological males out of women's sports.The IOC's policy, set to take effect at the 2028 Los Angeles Olympics, requires a mandatory gene test once in an athlete's career to determine eligibility. The test screens for the SRY gene, typically found on the Y chromosome, which initiates male sex development.According to the IOC, biological males have a performance advantage of 10-12% in most running and swimming events, and at least 20% in most throwing and jumping events. This advantage can be greater than 100% in explosive power events, such as punching sports.The policy change has been met with criticism from human rights experts and activist groups, who argue that the mandatory gender screening is invasive and discriminatory. The IOC has stated that the policy aims to protect "fairness, safety, and integrity in the female category."Caster Semenya, a two-time Olympic champion runner from South Africa, has been a prominent figure in the debate over female eligibility. The IOC's policy document details its research on the physical advantages retained by biological males, which it believes are retained even after transitioning.The US Olympic body has updated its guidance to national sports bodies, citing an obligation to comply with the White House's executive order. President Trump signed the order in February 2023, pledging to deny visas to athletes attempting to compete at the LA Olympics if they do not comply with the new rules.

The decision has garnered mixed reactions. The charity Sex Matters has welcomed the guidelines, calling them a necessary measure to secure a safe and fair female category. However, others, such as Dsdfamilies, have expressed concern that the proposed processes may cause harm to transgender and DSD athletes.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) has made a significant U-turn on its policy regarding transgender athletes, effectively banning them from competing in female events at the Olympics. This decision marks a major shift from their previous stance, which allowed transgender women to compete with certain conditions.In 2020, the IOC permitted Laurel Hubbard, a transgender weightlifter, to compete at the Tokyo Olympics, issuing a framework that stated transgender women “should not be deemed to have an unfair or disproportionate competitive advantage” over biological women. However, in a recent policy document, the IOC has stated that the female category must be protected for fairness and safety reasons, and will use SRY screening – a sex test using saliva or a cheek-swab – to determine biological sex.This new policy means that transgender women and athletes with differences in sex development (DSD), who were reported as female at birth but have internal testes and have undergone male puberty, are now banned from the female category at all future Olympics. The decision has caused anger among some groups and joy among others.According to Kirsty Coventry, the newly elected IOC president, this policy change was a priority for her, and she had set up a working group to examine the issue shortly after taking office. Coventry emphasized that the decision was based on scientific consensus and the need to protect the female category.The IOC's decision is based on scientific research showing that males have a performance advantage in sports, even after hormone treatment. The policy document states that the advantage is 10-12% in most running and swimming events, and greater than 100% in events that involve explosive power. This has led to sports such as athletics, swimming, and boxing introducing policies to protect the female category.While this decision applies only to elite sport, there could still be future challenges at the Court of Arbitration for Sport if transgender or DSD athletes decide to appeal. Nevertheless, the IOC's U-turn marks a seismic shift in the ongoing debate about transgender athletes and their participation in sports.

Olympic gold medal-winning boxer Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan has been cleared to return to competition at the Asian Boxing Championships following a review of her sex eligibility.World Boxing, the sport’s Olympic-level governing body, announced its decision before the Asian championships, which begin March 29 in Mongolia.Lin and Imane Khelif of Algeria won gold medals at the 2024 Paris Olympics amid international scrutiny and misconceptions over both boxers’ sex.While both met the eligibility rules followed at the time by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which ran the Paris tournament, the two fighters’ success led to a politically charged debate over those standards.World Boxing took over as the sport’s governing body last year, and it implemented a sex eligibility policy last August requiring all fighters to take a one-time genetic test designed to identify the presence of a Y chromosome.Lin has been absent from several international competitions since World Boxing introduced the test last summer.“We recognise that this has been a difficult period for the boxer and the CTBA and appreciate the way they have approached the appeal process and their acknowledgement of World Boxing’s requirement to ensure that its eligibility policy, which is designed to deliver safety and sporting integrity, has been correctly implemented and followed,” World Boxing secretary-general Tom Dielen said in a statement.Taiwan’s boxing association described the decision as a “tremendous relief” for Lin.“We are pleased that World Boxing’s independent medical experts thoroughly reviewed all evidence and confirmed that she has been female since birth,” it said in a statement.Lin “will make her highly anticipated return to the ring at the Asian Boxing Championships”, the statement said.