Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Daniel Křetínský, the Czech billionaire who acquired Royal Mail's parent company for £3.6bn last year, has pushed back against criticisms that the service has declined under his ownership. Despite heavy criticism of late deliveries and price rises, Křetínský insisted that service has not deteriorated. In a defensive performance before MPs on the business select committee, Křetínský said he was “deeply sorry” for any letters that arrive late. Since his takeover, Royal Mail has faced trade union disputes over working conditions, raised first-class stamp prices from £1.70 to £1.80, and delivered 16m Christmas letters late. Křetínský disputed a string of complaints, including that service is getting worse and that more lucrative parcels are being prioritized over letters. He argued that the UK's expectations for next-day delivery at relatively low prices are comparatively high compared to other European countries. For instance, he noted that in Italy, first-class letters cost €5.50 (£4.76) and regulators only require delivery targets to be met 80% of the time. With a week to go until Royal Mail’s service targets are reduced by the regulator Ofcom, Křetínský emphasized that the UK’s expectations remain far higher than those in other European countries. From next week, Ofcom will ease pressure on the postal service by lowering Royal Mail’s targets under the so-called “universal service obligation.” It will only require delivery of 90% of first-class mail within one working day (instead of 93%) and 95% of second-class mail within three days (instead of 98.5%). The committee’s chair, Liam Byrne, began the session by stating that Royal Mail is on track to deliver 220m letters late this year out of a total of 5.6bn. Křetínský denied that the service was prioritizing more profitable parcels over letters, attributing any instances of this to crisis moments rather than policy.

The United States' top intelligence official has identified Pakistan as one of five countries, alongside Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran, whose advancing missile capabilities could eventually pose a threat to US territory. Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard presented the 2026 Annual Threat Assessment before the Senate Intelligence Committee, highlighting that these countries are developing novel missile delivery systems with nuclear and conventional payloads that could reach the US homeland.Gabbard specifically noted that Pakistan's long-range ballistic missile development potentially includes Inter-Continental Ballistic Missiles (ICBMs) with a range capable of striking the US. The written assessment also flagged Pakistan across multiple threat categories, including missile technology and weapons of mass destruction.However, experts and Pakistani officials have pushed back against these claims. Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman, Tahir Andrabi, stated that Pakistan's strategic capabilities are 'exclusively defensive' and aimed at safeguarding national sovereignty and maintaining peace in South Asia. Experts also point out that Pakistan's longest-range operational missile, the Shaheen-III, has an estimated range of 2,750km, which is not sufficient to reach the US.The assessment has sparked a debate over intent, with some US officials suggesting that Pakistan might be developing missiles to deter Washington from intervening in a future India-Pakistan conflict. However, Pakistani analysts argue that Pakistan's deterrence posture is India-centric and not aimed at projecting power globally.The issue comes at a complex moment in US-Pakistan relations, which have undergone a diplomatic reset over the past year. US President Donald Trump has praised Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir, and has been involved in brokering a ceasefire between India and Pakistan. The situation highlights the intricate dynamics at play in South Asia and the ongoing challenges in the region.

Olympic gold medal-winning boxer Lin Yu-ting of Taiwan has been cleared to return to competition at the Asian Boxing Championships following a review of her sex eligibility.World Boxing, the sport’s Olympic-level governing body, announced its decision before the Asian championships, which begin March 29 in Mongolia.Lin and Imane Khelif of Algeria won gold medals at the 2024 Paris Olympics amid international scrutiny and misconceptions over both boxers’ sex.While both met the eligibility rules followed at the time by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), which ran the Paris tournament, the two fighters’ success led to a politically charged debate over those standards.World Boxing took over as the sport’s governing body last year, and it implemented a sex eligibility policy last August requiring all fighters to take a one-time genetic test designed to identify the presence of a Y chromosome.Lin has been absent from several international competitions since World Boxing introduced the test last summer.“We recognise that this has been a difficult period for the boxer and the CTBA and appreciate the way they have approached the appeal process and their acknowledgement of World Boxing’s requirement to ensure that its eligibility policy, which is designed to deliver safety and sporting integrity, has been correctly implemented and followed,” World Boxing secretary-general Tom Dielen said in a statement.Taiwan’s boxing association described the decision as a “tremendous relief” for Lin.“We are pleased that World Boxing’s independent medical experts thoroughly reviewed all evidence and confirmed that she has been female since birth,” it said in a statement.Lin “will make her highly anticipated return to the ring at the Asian Boxing Championships”, the statement said.

UEFA has rejected a request from English clubs to increase the size of Champions League squads to 28 players next season, following a backlash led by Spanish counterparts.The proposal, which was discussed at a UEFA club competitions committee meeting last month, failed to gain consensus due to concerns about Premier League clubs using their financial muscle to build stronger squads.The current 25-man squad limit has been in place for almost 20 years, and English clubs argued for an increase to reflect the competition's expansion and to protect against injury and burnout.Spanish representatives, including Atlético Madrid, Sevilla, and Real Sociedad, pushed back against the proposal, citing concerns about Premier League clubs' financial advantages.The decision means that the current squad regulations will remain in place for next season's Champions League, although the issue may be revisited before the 2027-28 season.

Scotland has taken a significant step in the early detection and treatment of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), a rare genetic condition that causes progressive muscle wastage, by becoming the first part of the UK to screen newborn babies for the condition.The screening, which is part of the existing heel prick test offered to all parents in Scotland about four days after birth, is funded by the Scottish government and pharmaceutical company Novartis. The goal is to assess how well screening can detect SMA earlier, allowing babies to receive treatment as soon as possible.SMA affects an estimated 1 in 14,000 births worldwide and impacts movement, breathing, and swallowing. Without treatment, it can limit life expectancy to two years. The condition was brought to wider attention after former Little Mix singer Jesy Nelson revealed in January that her twin daughters had been diagnosed with SMA.Campaigners, who have long advocated for newborn testing, hope the Scottish pilot will result in approval for the heel prick test across the UK. Giles Lomax, chief executive of SMA UK, said the screening pilot in Scotland would be “a huge impetus for other parts of the UK to speed up their own testing plans”. He hopes the Scotland trial will provide data that would convince the UK National Screening Committee to approve UK-wide testing.There is no cure for SMA, but there are now three NHS-funded drug treatments available. Lomax emphasized that with these treatments and newborn screening, “the future for anyone diagnosed with SMA is very different compared to their peers who were diagnosed symptomatically. It basically gives children the life they deserve.”

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has indicated that the government is considering providing support for household bills next winter, as the energy price shock triggered by the Iran conflict shows no signs of abating. Speaking to the Commons liaison committee, Starmer emphasized the need to examine 'every lever that's available' to help households cope with the cost of living impact. The government is reportedly discussing contingency plans at an emergency Cobra meeting, which will be attended by the governor of the Bank of England. Starmer suggested that any support would likely be targeted at the poorest households, rather than a universal bailout, which he acknowledged would be expensive. Ministers are also exploring means-testing support when the next energy price cap comes to an end in June, as well as in the autumn when energy consumption and bills are higher. 'We're looking at in the first instance what happens when the current price cap ends, which is the end of June,' Starmer said. The prime minister warned that despite US President Donald Trump's decision to postpone airstrikes on Iran's power plants, the energy crisis could continue for months to come. 'All of our focus and energy has to be in the swift de-escalation, but we've got to plan on the basis that it could go on for some time,' he said. In addition to support for household bills, the government is considering giving the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) 'further teeth' to prevent companies from exploiting the crisis through price gouging or profiteering.

The recent decision by the Small Business Administration (SBA) to deny loans to small business owners who are not US citizens has raised concerns about the politicization of the agency. Kelly Loeffler, the new administrator of the SBA, announced that the agency would no longer approve loans to small business owners unless they are US citizens, effectively excluding legal immigrants with green cards and full residency from accessing loans.This move has been criticized for being a political decision that harms small businesses and the economy. The SBA's mission is to support small businesses, which are the backbone of the US economy. By denying loans to certain entrepreneurs, the agency is limiting access to capital and hindering the growth of small businesses that could benefit their communities and the country at large.The decision is also seen as a reaction against the Biden administration's efforts to promote diversity and inclusion. Under Biden, the SBA had often featured diverse groups of business owners in its marketing materials, but this new policy seems to be tailoring the message to serve the Trump administration's political agenda.Supporting small businesses should not be a controversial position, and most of the time it is not. However, the SBA's politicization has made it a propaganda tool for the party in power, rather than a neutral agency serving the interests of small businesses.To address this issue, some suggest taking the SBA out of the government and spinning it off into a separate entity, similar to the Manufacturing Extension Partnership or the MITRE Corporation. This entity would be funded by both the government and private industry and would be required to report to Congress through its existing small business committees.The goal of this new entity would be to coordinate government loan guarantees, assist with federal funding, and provide training, counseling, and support to small businesses. This would help to insulate the agency from political cycles and ensure that it serves the interests of small businesses, rather than the interests of the party in power.

The ongoing conflict between the US and Iran has significant implications for the UK economy, with the potential to plunge the country into a severe energy crisis. The Strait of Hormuz, a critical shipping lane for oil, is now rendered unsafe due to Iranian drones and mines, threatening to disrupt global fuel supplies. Historically, the UK has faced similar challenges, such as during the Suez crisis 70 years ago, when petrol rationing was introduced. Former BP executive Nick Butler warns that if the crisis persists, the UK could be just weeks away from needing to ration fuel, with critical users like emergency services being prioritized. The economic consequences of such a crisis are far-reaching. A sustained energy crisis could push up average British household energy bills by £500, according to the Resolution Foundation thinktank. This would further exacerbate the cost of living crisis, which has already seen inflationary shocks and a backlash against incumbents. The UK government faces difficult decisions. Chancellor Rachel Reeves has already taken steps to help 1.7 million households reliant on oil for heating and hot water, whose bills have doubled. However, her warning that financial help will be targeted at lower earners suggests that harder decisions lie ahead. In the long term, the UK must consider investing in net zero initiatives to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Modelling by the government's expert Climate Change Committee suggests that if Britain sticks to its net zero path, even a substantial oil shock would raise energy bills by only 4% by 2040. However, implementing such policies in the midst of a crisis is a challenging task.