Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

New York City's public hospital system has announced that it will not be renewing its contract with Palantir, a data analytics and AI firm, amid growing controversy over its government contracts in the UK. The decision comes as health officials in the UK express concerns over data privacy issues related to Palantir's £330m agreement with the National Health Service (NHS).The contract between NYC Health + Hospitals and Palantir, which focused on recovering money for insurance claims, was set to expire in October. According to documents shared with the Guardian, Palantir has paid nearly $4m to the hospital system since November 2023. The contract allowed Palantir to review patient health notes and help the hospital claim more money in public benefits through programs like Medicaid.Despite assurances from NYC Health + Hospitals that there was an 'absolute firewall' preventing Palantir from sharing information with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), activists and data privacy experts have raised concerns over the potential risks of Palantir accessing de-identified patient data for purposes other than research.As New York City prepares to part ways with Palantir, the company is expanding its influence in the UK, despite backlash from activists and lawmakers. Palantir has contracts with the British government's Ministry of Defence and is seeking access to sensitive national financial regulation data through a contract with the Financial Conduct Authority.Medact, a health justice charity, has raised concerns that Palantir's software could enable 'data-driven state abuses of power', including US-style ICE raids. In response, Palantir has denied that its data could be used in this way, citing that it would be illegal and a breach of contract.The decision by NYC Health + Hospitals to drop Palantir has been hailed as a victory by activists, who are now calling on the NHS to follow suit and terminate its £330m contract with the company. The 'Purge Palantir' campaign, which involves nurses, pro-Palestinian activists, and social and climate justice groups, aims to stop Palantir from contracting with government agencies, universities, and corporations.

The US military operation in Iran has cost a staggering $20bn to date, sparking widespread outrage and protests among American citizens. As tax day approaches, a growing movement of individuals is refusing to pay their federal income taxes to protest against the war. The protesters argue that the war is unjustified and that they do not want their tax dollars to fund military actions that have resulted in civilian casualties, including the killing of over 150 girls in Iran and 73,000 Palestinians in Gaza. They claim that the US government has not consulted Congress or the American people before launching the military operation, which is a clear violation of the separation of powers. The movement is inspired by a long history of war tax resistance in the US, dating back to the American Revolution. In 1637, the Algonquin Nation refused to pay taxes to the Dutch to support their new military fort, and Quakers were the first organized religion to oppose wartime taxation as a rule. War tax resisters are not simply refusing to pay taxes; they are also redirecting the taxes they would have paid to alternative causes, such as relief aid for those affected by the war. This approach is based on the principle that taxpayers have a right to choose how their taxes are spent and that they should not be forced to fund actions that go against their values. The movement is gaining momentum, with up to 50% of federal taxes going towards military spending. While some individuals may face consequences for not paying taxes, many war tax resisters have never faced penalties, and only two individuals have served time for non-payment of taxes in protest of US military interventions since World War II. The war tax resistance movement is part of a broader effort to challenge the US government's military adventurism and to promote civil disobedience as a means of bringing about change. As one protester noted, 'Silent resistance is untenable now. Public and open rejection of our 'peace' president and his military adventurism is the only way for this tactic to have its maximum effect.'

Wales' dreams of qualifying for the 2026 World Cup were cruelly extinguished in a penalty shootout against Bosnia and Herzegovina, with the visitors prevailing on spot-kicks after a 1-1 draw in an electrifying encounter at the Cardiff City Stadium.The match saw Wales dominate possession and create numerous chances, with Daniel James scoring a stunning goal seven minutes into the second half. However, Edin Dzeko's header in the 65th minute forced the game into extra time, where neither team could find a winner.The game ultimately went to penalties, where Bosnia and Herzegovina goalkeeper Nikola Vasilj made a crucial save from Neco Williams to seal the win. The result marks a devastating blow to Wales' World Cup aspirations and a significant upset given their strong performance throughout the match.Daniel James's goal had given Wales a 1-0 lead, but Dzeko's equalizer ensured Bosnia and Herzegovina stayed in the game. The visitors' resilience and determination ultimately paid off as they secured a spot in the next round of the playoffs.

UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced plans to address addictive features in social media platforms, signaling a potential regulatory shift following a significant US court ruling that held Meta and YouTube accountable for harms caused by their technology designs.The prime minister emphasized that the recent California court verdict reflects rising public expectations for more aggressive regulation of social media platforms. "I'm absolutely clear that we need to go further," Starmer stated, adding that "the status quo isn't good enough" in terms of protecting children online.Starmer specifically mentioned that the government is consulting about banning social media for under-16s and expressed strong commitment to addressing addictive features within social media platforms. These remarks come amid growing international pressure on tech companies to address the potential harms of their products on young users.In the landmark US case, a California jury found Meta and YouTube negligent for failing to provide adequate warnings about the potential dangers of their platforms. The plaintiff, a 20-year-old woman who claimed she became addicted to social media during her childhood, was awarded $6 million (£4.5 million) in damages, with Meta responsible for 70% of the payment and YouTube covering the remainder.The Duke and Duchess of Sussex welcomed the verdict as "a reckoning" for tech companies, stating in a joint statement: "For too long, families have paid the price for platforms built with total disregard for the children they reach." They emphasized that "today, the truth has been heard and precedent has been set" regarding children's safety versus corporate profits.Both Google, which owns YouTube, and Meta have indicated they will challenge the decision. Google claimed the case "misunderstands YouTube, which is a responsibly built streaming platform, not a social media site," while Meta stated it "respectfully disagrees with the verdict and is evaluating our legal options." The verdict came after nine days of deliberation in the first lawsuit concerning social media's alleged harm to young people to reach trial.The ruling has resonated beyond the courtroom, with European Commission digital chief Henna Virkkunen noting that such cases send "a very clear message" to online platforms about the risks they pose. Campaigners for safer social media have celebrated the decision as a potential watershed moment in regulating platforms like TikTok, Instagram, and X.The Molly Rose Foundation, established after the death of 14-year-old Molly Russell who was exposed to harmful content on Instagram, called for legislation that would make "safety and wellbeing the price for tech firms to pay for doing business in the UK." Thomas Lancaster, a computing expert at Imperial College London, emphasized that policies must be effectively enforced to protect those they're designed to safeguard.Sacha Haworth, executive director of the Tech Oversight Project, declared that "the era of big tech invincibility is over," suggesting that the verdict validates concerns about tech platforms' impact on young people that have been raised for years.

The recent story of Julie Maughan, a grieving mother who lost her eight-year-old daughter Heather Preen due to exposure to polluted water, has left an indelible mark. The Channel 4 docudrama Dirty Business brings to light the struggles of campaigners and families fighting against privatised water companies and a system that often fails to protect them.In a poignant meeting, Julie Maughan's emotional testimony, marked by grief, dignity, and determination, underscored the human cost of water privatisation. Her story starkly contrasts with the detached world of statistics and policy debates, illustrating the moral failure of a system that prioritises profit over people's lives.Clive Lewis, Labour MP for Norwich South, argues that the water industry's model, which allows private companies to profit from a basic necessity while the public bears the risk, is fundamentally flawed. This has led to billions being paid to shareholders while investment falls short and pollution becomes routine.The article highlights the broader implications of water privatisation as a microcosm of a larger systemic problem. With millions of households facing another wave of pressure on their living standards due to an impending energy price surge, the question remains whether the current economic framework can adapt to address these challenges.Lewis emphasises that Labour must decide whether it stands with the electorate or the water companies, advocating for a fundamental reorientation of the economy that prioritises the public interest over profit. The story of Julie Maughan and her daughter Heather serves as a powerful reminder of the human cost of policy failures and the urgent need for change.

Los Angeles Rams star receiver Puka Nacua is facing a civil lawsuit filed by a woman named Madison Atiabi, who claims he made an antisemitic statement and bit her on the shoulder on New Year's Eve. According to the lawsuit, Nacua allegedly said 'fuck all Jews' during a dinner in Los Angeles, which Atiabi, who is Jewish, found deeply distressing.The lawsuit also alleges that Nacua bit Atiabi on the shoulder, leaving teeth marks, and also bit her friend's thumb 'with such force that her companion screamed in acute pain.' The suit cites gender violence and negligence in addition to the antisemitic remark and biting incident.Nacua's attorney, Levi McCathern, has strongly denied the allegations, stating that multiple sober witnesses confirm Nacua never made the claimed comments. McCathern described the bites as 'horseplay' and announced that Nacua intends to sue Atiabi for defamation. This development comes after Nacua apologized last December for performing a gesture that invoked antisemitic tropes during an internet livestream.The 24-year-old receiver had a stellar season with the Rams, leading the league with 129 catches, 1,715 yards, and 10 touchdowns, and then leading the NFL again in playoff catches. His future with the Rams includes eligibility for a contract extension this offseason that could make him one of the highest-paid receivers in NFL history.

The App Store Connect Transformation Apple has announced a significant update to its App Store Connect service, introducing over 100 new metrics and tools designed to help developers better understand and optimize their apps' performance across Apple's platforms. This overhaul comes at a critical time as the tech industry debates the future of app stores in the age of artificial intelligence. Expanded Metrics and Data Insights The updated App Store Connect now provides developers with comprehensive metrics across key areas including monetization, subscription data, and in-app purchase performance. Unlike third-party services that offer estimated data, Apple's metrics are based directly on the company's own data, providing more accurate insights into app performance. Among the new features are subscription reports that can be exported via an API, enabling developers to analyze their apps' performance offline or integrate Apple's data into their own systems. Developers can now gain deeper understanding of their users by analyzing behavior around download dates, sources, offer start dates, and other key engagement metrics. Competitive Analysis and Benchmarking Apple has introduced peer group benchmarks that allow developers to compare their performance against competitors in critical areas like download-to-paid conversions and proceeds per download. This feature provides valuable context for developers to assess their market position and identify opportunities for improvement. Apple emphasizes that it uses aggregated cohort data and differential privacy techniques to protect both user privacy and individual developer performance data, ensuring that insights can be gained without compromising sensitive information. Enhanced Data Filtering and Analytics Guide Developers can now apply up to seven filters simultaneously when viewing metrics in App Store Connect, allowing for more granular analysis of their app data. This enhanced filtering capability enables deeper dives into specific aspects of app performance. To support developers in making data-driven decisions, Apple has published a new App Store Analytics Guide in the Help section of App Store Connect. This comprehensive resource aims to help developers better understand the App Store's tools and features and develop effective strategies for app success. Strategic Timing Amid AI Evolution The timing of this App Store Connect overhaul is particularly noteworthy, as the industry witnesses rapid advancements in AI capabilities. There's growing speculation that AI agents could eventually replace traditional app stores, with some industry leaders suggesting that smartphone apps may become obsolete as AI-powered web services become more prevalent. Apple appears to be strategically positioning itself to strengthen its lucrative App Store ecosystem rather than allowing it to be disrupted by emerging technologies. The company is reportedly planning to announce an AI-powered Siri at its upcoming developer conference in June, which will be capable of completing tasks within apps, potentially bridging the gap between traditional apps and AI-powered services.

A jury in the United States has ordered social media giant Meta to pay $375m for harming children's mental health and making them vulnerable to sexual exploitation.The verdict, handed down in New Mexico after a six-week trial, marks the first time a US state has successfully sued Meta over child safety issues. State authorities accused Meta, the parent company of Instagram, Facebook, and WhatsApp, of failing to protect minors.Jurors sided with state prosecutors who argued that Meta prioritized profits over safety and violated parts of New Mexico's Unfair Practices Act. The jury agreed with allegations that Meta made false or misleading statements and engaged in 'unconscionable' trade practices that unfairly took advantage of the vulnerabilities and inexperience of children.The case involved testimony from 40 witnesses, including employees-turned-whistle-blowers, and reviewed hundreds of documents, reports, and emails. New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez called the verdict 'a historic victory for every child and family who has paid the price for Meta's choice to put profits over kids' safety.'Meta has stated that it will appeal the verdict, with a spokesperson saying, 'We respectfully disagree with the verdict and will appeal. We work hard to keep people safe on our platforms and are clear about the challenges of identifying and removing bad actors or harmful content.'A second phase in New Mexico's proceedings against Meta is scheduled to begin in May, when a judge will hear the state's claim that the company should be ordered to pay additional penalties and make specific changes to its platforms and company operations.

As the conflict drags on, Iranians are attempting to maintain a semblance of ordinary life in the face of constant explosions and airstrikes. The days following Nowruz, the Persian New Year, are usually a time of renewal and celebration, but this year, the atmosphere is tense."More and more, people are starting to normalise this war", said Farhad, a photography editor in Tehran. "It's difficult, but we're adapting and trying to return to our daily lives as much as possible. There's no alternative. We're tired. We just want peace."Despite the challenges, some Iranians are finding ways to cope. Aylar, a 39-year-old human rights worker, paid for an expensive VPN to circumvent the internet blackout imposed by Iranian authorities so she could stay in touch with relatives abroad. She also made time for a coffee date with friends, highlighting the complexity of life during conflict.The humanitarian toll is significant, with Iran's official death toll frozen at around 1,500, but the real figure may be more than 3,000, according to the Iranian Human Rights Activists News Agency. Many more have been injured, and the psychological impact is profound.As the situation continues to unfold, uncertainty and division within Iranian society are palpable. While most Iranians oppose the war, some have welcomed it as a potential catalyst for change. The future remains uncertain, with concerns that the conflict could become a recurring reality.