Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

LIV Golf chief executive Scott O'Neil has acknowledged that the rebel golf tour's finances are being managed very tightly and that structural changes are on the horizon, which may necessitate raising additional funds. However, he emphatically stated that the league will not fold.O'Neil's comments come on the heels of reports that Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund, a key backer of LIV Golf, is cutting its funding for the league. Despite this, O'Neil described the situation as 'business as usual' and expressed confidence in the tour's future prospects.In an interview with LIV employees during the broadcast of the tour's Mexico City event, O'Neil hinted at upcoming structural changes but did not provide specifics. He suggested that these changes could involve new formats or business structures, possibly including team-based elements.O'Neil also downplayed speculation about the tour's financial health, stating that LIV Golf had secured almost $500 million in sponsorships last year from major brands like Rolex, HSBC, and Aramco. He emphasized the tour's global appeal, particularly in markets such as Australia and Asia, where it has attracted significant interest.While acknowledging that fundraising may be necessary, O'Neil expressed optimism about the tour's trajectory, suggesting that continued revenue growth could mitigate the need for external funding. He concluded by stating that LIV Golf is poised for long-term success and will continue to evolve in the coming months.

A Senate vote on Wednesday failed to block a proposed sale of military bulldozers to Israel, with the measure losing 40‑59. Only seven Democrats crossed party lines to side with the Republican majority, underscoring a notable, though limited, shift in congressional sentiment.Progressive Senator Bernie Sanders introduced the bill amid mounting outrage over Israel’s use of bulldozers to raze villages in Gaza and Lebanon—actions described by rights groups as ethnic cleansing. While the resolution did not pass, 36 Democratic senators also backed a separate effort to stop 1,000‑lb bombs from reaching Israel, more than double the support such measures received last year.Advocacy organizations seized on the vote as a historic moment. Hassan el‑Tayyab of the Friends Committee on National Legislation said the tally shows a majority of Senate Democrats now oppose unconditional aid, aligning with broader American opinion. A recent Pew Research Center poll found 60 % of U.S. adults hold unfavorable views of Israel, with even higher negativity among voters under 50.Republican senators remained uniformly opposed. Senator Rick Scott accused the Democratic supporters of siding with terrorism, arguing that the blocked sales would have helped allies confront threats. The partisan divide highlights the political risk for Republicans who break with former President Donald Trump on Israel policy.Prominent lobbying groups also weighed in. The pro‑Israel lobby AIPAC warned that curbing arms sales would jeopardize Israel’s security, while liberal Zionist organization J Street welcomed the growing willingness to question unconditional assistance. Jewish Voice for Peace’s political director Beth Miller called the vote an "inflection point," suggesting it reveals "massive cracks" in the long‑standing U.S.–Israel alliance.Within the Democratic caucus, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer faced criticism for voting against the resolution, prompting calls from progressive lawmakers like Rep. Ro Khanna for his resignation. Demonstrators outside Schumer’s and Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand’s offices demanded they support the bill, reflecting intensified grassroots pressure.The episode signals a potential realignment in U.S. foreign‑policy calculations. As public fatigue with the Gaza war, the Lebanon conflict, and the stalled Iran confrontation grows, lawmakers appear increasingly wary of using American tax dollars to fund overseas military operations that could entangle U.S. troops and erode domestic support.

The sports world is reeling from the news that Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF) is pulling back its financial support for LIV Golf, a rebel tour that has been a key vehicle for the kingdom's ambitious attempts to become a leading global sports destination.Conservatively estimated to have cost Saudi Arabia over $10bn in the past five years, the slowdown in lavish spending on sport was expected, but the withdrawal of PIF's support has sent shockwaves throughout the industry. This move was first communicated to LIV executives on Monday, leaving many employees fearing for their jobs.The uncertainty is not limited to golf, with other sports administrators worried that similar cuts could be coming their way. LIV Golf's future is now in doubt, with the tour's chief executive, Scott O'Neil, failing to address the possibility of PIF's withdrawal in an email to staff on Wednesday evening.Sports executives outside golf have expressed concerns about the future, stating, 'We all went running to Saudi for a quick payday and are now wondering what the future holds.' The PIF's investment strategy now focuses on domestic benefits and building real businesses, with LIV Golf being seen as vulnerable due to its lack of profitability.The PIF's financial strategy for 2026-2030 emphasizes 'value realisation through performance, innovation, and private sector engagement.' While sport is not listed as one of PIF's six investment pillars, it will be included under the tourism, travel, and entertainment portfolio.The move towards privatization is evident, with PIF selling a 70% stake in Al-Hilal, one of its Saudi Pro League clubs, to a private company owned by Prince Al Waleed bin Talal Al Saud. Other sports, such as Esports, boxing, and mixed martial arts, are expected to continue receiving investment due to their popularity and potential for growth.The implications of PIF's shift in strategy extend beyond golf, with Newcastle United and other sports organizations potentially affected. As Saudi Arabia continues to invest heavily in certain sports, the future of others, like LIV Golf, remains uncertain.

LIV Golf, a breakaway tour backed by Saudi Arabia's Public Investment Fund (PIF), is facing an uncertain future as the fund is expected to withdraw its support in 2026. This development has significant implications for the careers of several leading golfers who made lucrative switches to LIV. The PIF's expected withdrawal could leave many golfers in career limbo, with some, such as Bryson DeChambeau and Jon Rahm, potentially having a pathway back to the PGA Tour. However, the future for others who joined LIV is far more uncertain. The tour's executives recently attended a summit with the PIF in New York, where the financial impact of the Middle East crisis was discussed. LIV's chief executive, Scott O'Neil, has attempted to reassure staff and players that the tour's season will continue as planned, but the lack of commitment beyond 2026 has fueled speculation and concern. Since its inception in 2021, LIV is understood to have burned through more than $5bn of PIF money. Despite this, the tour has made strides towards becoming more commercially viable, attracting blue-chip sponsors such as Rolex and HSBC. The PGA Tour has smoothed a path for some LIV golfers to return, including Brooks Koepka and Patrick Reed. However, the scenario for others is far less obvious, particularly for those who lack the pull to return to the PGA Tour. The DP World Tour, formerly European Tour, may benefit from LIV's potential demise, given its willingness to re-engage with LIV players. The uncertainty surrounding LIV's future also has implications for women's golf in Europe, with the PIF Saudi Ladies International and other events potentially being affected if the kingdom diverts attention away from the sport.

The Scotland women's rugby team encountered significant contract uncertainty before their 2025 Rugby World Cup quarter-final appearance. According to former Scotland international Beth Blacklock, the situation was stressful for many players, with some having contracts that ended in October after the World Cup.In the lead-up to the tournament, talks took place between players and the Scottish Rugby Union (SRU). While 21 of the 32 players in the World Cup squad received contracts, 11 did not. Blacklock, who was one of the players without a new deal, described the process as 'difficult' to see teammates struggling with uncertainty.The SRU stated they engaged with the Scotland Women playing group over several months, including face-to-face and online meetings, to work through the contracting process ahead of the Rugby World Cup. Despite this, Rachel Malcolm, the Scotland captain, described the talks as 'disruptive' to their preparations.Blacklock, who has since retired from international rugby and is pursuing a career in data engineering and aviation, expressed excitement about the new era for Scottish women's rugby under coach Sione Fukofuka. She praised Fukofuka's organized plan and the team's potential for growth.The next significant test for the team will be their first standalone match at Murrayfield against the defending champions, England, with nearly 30,000 tickets sold.

After Bournemouth’s 2‑1 triumph over Arsenal at the Emirates on Saturday, manager Andoni Iraola celebrated with a broad smile, acknowledging the win as the third victory in four encounters with the league leaders and a clear sign that his project is gaining momentum. Having risen from administration to the Premier League under Eddie Howe, the Cherries have long been viewed through the lens of Howe’s legacy. Iconic moments such as the 2019 4‑0 demolition of Chelsea cemented that era. Following Howe’s 2020 relegation, a succession of domestic appointments – Jason Tindall, Jonathan Woodgate, Scott Parker and Gary O’Neil – produced mixed outcomes, with O’Neil’s dismissal after a respectable finish highlighting the club’s desire for a new direction under owner Bill Foley. Iraola arrived from Athletic Bilbao, where he amassed over 500 appearances, bringing a philosophy that blends Bilbao’s directness with a British‑style width. Early on, his tenure appeared rocky: the first nine league games yielded no wins and left Bournemouth in 19th place, punctuated by a heavy 6‑1 loss to Manchester City. Yet a narrow victory over Burnley sparked a turnaround, culminating in a seven‑match unbeaten run that added 19 crucial points. Statistically, the Cherries have become more than occasional spoilers. While they previously earned just 0.42 points per game against the traditional ‘big six’, under Iraola they have improved to 1.5 points per game in both the 2024‑25 season and the current campaign, recording nine wins and seven defeats against top opposition. Their current 11th‑place standing reflects a blend of competitive resilience and entertaining football built on athleticism, work rate and on‑ball daring. The club’s on‑field evolution has translated into a remarkable transfer market windfall. Key departures include Dominic Solanke to Tottenham for £55 million, Dean Huijsen to Real Madrid for £50 million, Illia Zabarnyi to Paris Saint‑Germain for £54.5 million, Milos Kerkez to Liverpool for £40 million, Dango Ouattara to Brentford for £42 million and Antoine Semenyo to Manchester City for £62.5 million. Collectively, these sales amount to a staggering £304 million, underscoring Bournemouth’s emergence as a premier talent factory alongside clubs like Brighton and Brentford. Looking ahead, Iraola is set to depart at the end of the season, with speculation linking him to high‑profile roles at Manchester United, his native Athletic Bilbao or other continental giants. Bournemouth’s board has already identified Marco Rose – renowned for his high‑intensity approach that benefitted Erling Haaland and Jude Bellingham – as a potential successor, signaling a commitment to maintain the club’s dynamic style. In the broader context, Bournemouth’s transformation illustrates how a mid‑table Premier League side can leverage strategic coaching, a clear playing identity and savvy player development to generate both on‑field success and substantial financial returns, effectively moving beyond the shadow of Eddie Howe.

Senate Democrats have moved to stall President Donald Trump's bid to install a new leader of the US Federal Reserve, condemning the move as 'absurd' given ongoing criminal investigations into the central bank's leadership.Democratic lawmakers on the Senate banking committee urged its Republican leadership to postpone the planned confirmation hearing for Kevin Warsh, the financial executive and former Fed governor Trump has nominated to replace Jerome Powell as Fed chair.In a letter to banking committee chair Senator Tim Scott, the 11 Democrats called for a hearing currently scheduled for Tuesday to be delayed until investigations into Powell and Lisa Cook, a Fed governor, are closed.Powell is facing a criminal investigation into the renovations of the central bank's headquarters, which he dismissed as a 'pretext' tied to the Fed's refusal to bow to Trump's demands. The Trump administration also tried to fire Cook, an appointee of Joe Biden, for alleged mortgage fraud.The Democratic senators wrote in their letter to Scott: 'It would be absurd on its face to allow President Trump to handpick the next chair of the Federal Reserve as his Department of Justice actively pursues criminal investigations of not one, but two sitting members of the Federal Reserve board.'Warsh's nomination also faces hurdles from within the president's own party, with outgoing GOP senator Thom Tillis stating he would not support any nomination as long as there is an investigation into Powell.

Washington, D.C. – The U.S. Senate voted 47‑52 to reject a resolution that would have limited President Donald Trump’s power to wage war against Iran, marking the fourth defeat of the measure despite weekly attempts by lawmakers. The vote follows a two‑week ceasefire agreed upon last week, though subsequent negotiations in Islamabad failed to produce a longer‑term deal. Both sides have indicated openness to a second round of talks. President Trump’s earlier threats, including a statement on April 7 that a “whole civilisation will die tonight,” intensified congressional calls for constraints on his war‑making authority. Party lines largely dictated the outcome: Republican Rand Paul voted in favor, while Democrat John Fetterman broke with his party to oppose the resolution. Supporters argue that Trump acted beyond constitutional limits when he joined Israel in launching the February 28 offensive. The U.S. Constitution reserves the declaration of war for Congress, allowing presidents to act unilaterally only in cases of immediate self‑defence. Senator Chris Murphy, speaking before the vote, described the conflict as a “bungled, mismanaged war” that has failed to meet the administration’s objectives. He criticized the lack of transparency and oversight, noting that the war is costing “billions of dollars every week,” has claimed “over a dozen American lives,” and is destabilising economies worldwide. Republican Senator Jim Risch defended Trump’s actions, dismissing the resolution as “same old, same old” and asserting that the president has both the right and duty to act. The House of Representatives is slated to consider its own war‑powers resolution this week, with a higher likelihood of passage given growing wariness among some Republicans. Even if both chambers approved the measure, Trump could veto it, requiring a two‑thirds supermajority to override. Under the War Powers Act of 1973, Congress must either authorize the military action or approve a 30‑day extension when the conflict reaches its 60‑day mark at the end of April. Failure to do so would legally compel the president to begin withdrawing forces. U.S. blockade updates: U.S. Central Command reported that no vessels have successfully breached the blockade of Iranian ports in the Strait of Hormuz over the past 48 hours, with nine ships complying with orders to turn back. The U.S. Navy warned that vessels attempting to transit will be boarded for interdiction and seizure. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced a forthcoming set of financial measures described as the “financial equivalent” of military attacks, while noting that some sanctions had been lifted to ease soaring global energy prices. White House spokesperson Karoline Leavitt said the administration has not formally requested an extension of the ceasefire, which is set to expire next week, but expressed optimism about a second round of talks in Islamabad. Iran’s state‑run television reported that a high‑level Pakistani delegation arrived in Tehran to coordinate new negotiations. Meanwhile, Major‑General Ali Abdollahi of the IRGC warned that the ongoing naval blockade could jeopardise the fragile ceasefire, describing it as a “prelude to a violation of the ceasefire.”

President Donald Trump declared that the war with Iran is "very close to over," even as Washington maintains a naval blockade of the strategic Strait of Hormuz. In Washington, D.C., Israeli and Lebanese ambassadors convened for uncommon direct talks, seeking a cease‑fire while Israel pressed for Hezbollah’s disarmament. Trump also hinted at a possible second round of negotiations with Tehran, suggesting talks could resume in Pakistan within days. The United States, however, is set to let a temporary sanctions waiver on stranded Iranian oil expire, tightening economic pressure on Tehran. The International Committee of the Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies delivered its first shipment of medical supplies and humanitarian aid into Iran since hostilities began, offering a modest lifeline to civilians. Inside Tehran, minor explosions caused limited damage and injuries, underscoring ongoing instability. Iran estimates its war‑related losses at $270 billion and plans to seek reparations. On the diplomatic front, the United Nations' IAEA chief Rafael Grossi noted that the duration of any uranium‑enrichment moratorium would be a political decision, reflecting the delicate balance of future negotiations. In the United States, the Senate is poised to vote as early as Wednesday on a Democratic initiative to restrict the president’s war powers, signaling growing congressional scrutiny of the conflict. Former defence official David Sedney warned that the Hormuz blockade is backfiring, increasing pressure on Washington as global trade routes are disrupted and domestic support wanes. Meanwhile, CENTCOM Commander Admiral Brad Cooper affirmed that the blockade of Iranian ports is fully operational and that U.S. forces retain maritime superiority in the region. President Trump publicly rebuked Italy’s Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni for not joining U.S. actions against Iran, describing her stance as lacking courage. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent announced that American forces will intercept Chinese tankers carrying Iranian oil through the Hormuz Strait, effectively cutting off Iran’s oil exports while allowing non‑Iranian cargo to pass. Israel has proposed a long‑term troop presence extending up to 8 km into southern Lebanon until Hezbollah is dismantled, and continues air strikes aimed at encircling the strategic town of Bint Jbeil. Former U.S. Assistant Secretary of State Jeffrey Feltman highlighted a growing divergence between U.S. and Israeli priorities, noting Israel’s heightened concern over Iran’s ballistic‑missile program. In Lebanon, Israeli raids have resulted in multiple civilian casualties, with reports of villages being razed in a manner likened to Gaza. Hezbollah has rejected the ongoing Israel‑Lebanon talks, while public opinion remains split between hopes for peace and opposition to negotiations. The International Monetary Fund warned that any further escalation could push the global economy toward recession. It cut its 2026 growth forecast for the Middle East and North Africa to 1.1 % from 3.9 %, citing disruptions to Gulf oil and gas exports. On the markets, stock indices rose while oil prices slipped, reflecting renewed optimism for a diplomatic resolution and the reopening of the Hormuz Strait.