Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Adele Bertei's memoir, 'No New York', provides an essential slice of New York's bohemian history, particularly its no wave music scene in the late 1970s. Bertei, a relative unknown, brings a fresh perspective to the era, unencumbered by cultural baggage.Bertei's journey begins with her arrival in Manhattan in 1977, a city struggling with a municipal debt crisis and frequent fires. However, this period also saw a creative explosion, with the avant-garde art scene thriving post-Warhol. Bertei immerses herself in the alternative scene, crossing paths with future counter-culture icons like Joey Ramone and Alan Vega.Her writing vividly captures the era's spirit, describing the no wave music scene as "Dada brutalism" and a "negation of every way that had come before". As a member of the Contortions, Bertei experiences firsthand the challenging nature of the music, which was an expression of a darker collective reality. She also highlights the barriers faced by women and queers in the music industry, where sexism and homophobia were prevalent.Bertei's memoir is not without its challenges, as the focus shifts post-no wave, and she becomes a witness to subsequent cultural moments rather than a central figure. Despite this, her vivid and visceral account remains essential reading for anyone interested in alternative music.No New York: A Memoir of No Wave and the Women Who Shaped the Scene by Adele Bertei is published by Faber (£20).

The Coruna and DarkSword Threat For years, the prevailing narrative among iPhone security experts was that breaking through Apple's defenses was a rare, high-barrier event requiring significant resources. However, recent investigations by Google, iVerify, and Lookout have shattered this assumption. Researchers have documented broad-scale hacking campaigns utilizing two specific tools, Coruna and DarkSword, which have been used to target victims globally who are not running the latest software updates. Attack Vectors: Hackers are compromising legitimate websites and creating fake pages to deliver spyware. Key Actors: Involvement of Russian spies and Chinese cybercriminals. Tool Availability: The source code for these tools has leaked online, allowing anyone to launch attacks against older iPhones. The Two-Tier iPhone Security Landscape The discovery of Coruna and DarkSword highlights a critical data point in the current security ecosystem: the existence of two distinct classes of iPhone users. This bifurcation is driven by the introduction of Memory Integrity Enforcement in iOS 26, a feature designed to prevent memory corruption bugs—the very vulnerabilities exploited by DarkSword. Class A (Secure): Users on the latest iPhone 17 models running iOS 26 are protected by memory-safe code and Lockdown Mode, making them resistant to these specific memory-based hacks. Class B (Vulnerable): Users running iOS 18 or older versions remain exposed to memory corruption attacks, as these older systems lack the new safety enforcement layers. Challenging the 'Rare Hack' Myth The widespread use of these leaked tools suggests that spyware attacks are becoming more common and less exclusive. This shift is fueled by a thriving "second-hand" market for exploits, where brokers resell vulnerabilities before they are patched. Experts argue that the rarity of iPhone hacks has been overstated simply because they are rarely documented. As noted by Patrick Wardle, the baseline capability for such attacks is now accessible to a wider range of actors, moving beyond state-sponsored actors to include cybercriminals. The End of the 'Rare Hack' Era The future of mobile security appears to be one of continuous escalation. With the code for Coruna and DarkSword now public, the barrier to entry for launching attacks against older devices has lowered significantly. This indicates that memory-based exploits will continue to plague lagging users, and the market for exploit development will likely expand as brokers seek to monetize vulnerabilities before updates are applied.

The Dual Threat: Coruna and DarkSwordSecurity researchers have identified two distinct but equally dangerous hacking toolkits, Coruna and DarkSword, that have leaked onto the open web. These advanced exploit kits, capable of breaking into iPhones and iPads, were originally developed for high-level government surveillance but are now available for anyone to download.Coruna: Targets iOS 13 through 17.2.1. Linked to Trenchant, a unit within U.S. defense contractor L3Harris, and previously used in Operation Triangulation against Russian targets.DarkSword: Targets iOS 18.4 and 18.7. Leaked on GitHub, making it "plug-and-play" for cybercriminals.The Scale of VulnerabilityThe scale of this exposure is staggering. According to Apple's statistics, nearly one-in-three iPhone and iPad users are still not running the latest software. With over 2.5 billion active devices globally, this implies hundreds of millions of users are susceptible to these attacks.DarkSword is particularly concerning because it targets newer devices running iOS 18.4 and 18.7. Researchers have already tested the leaked code, successfully hacking their own devices to demonstrate the ease of use.From State-Sponsored Espionage to Public ExploitationThis leak marks a dangerous shift in the cybersecurity landscape. Historically, sophisticated tools like Coruna were the domain of state-sponsored actors targeting specific regions, such as the Uyghurs in China or activists in Hong Kong.However, the release of DarkSword represents a move toward indiscriminate cybercrime. The tool is written in web languages like HTML and JavaScript, allowing attackers to launch attacks simply by hosting a malicious website. Victims in China, Malaysia, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and Ukraine have already been targeted.The Future of Zero-Day WeaponizationThe leak of these tools mirrors the infamous 2017 WannaCry ransomware attack, which was fueled by leaked NSA exploits. Once powerful zero-day vulnerabilities are released into the wild, they are nearly impossible to fully contain.Experts recommend immediate action: users must update to iOS 18.7.6 or iOS 26.3.1. For high-risk individuals, enabling Lockdown Mode remains the most effective defense, as there is currently no public evidence of hackers bypassing its protections.

Egil Johansen, the landlord of the Kenton pub in Hackney, east London, describes recent incidents involving children as "like the wild west." He has now banned children entirely after a three-year-old fell down a cellar hatch while parents sat elsewhere, a five-year-old crashed into staff carrying drinks, and six parents brought 10 hyperactive children after a birthday party while ignoring their behavior."In every case, the parents blame us when something goes wrong or get really angry when we ask them to control their children," says Johansen, who has run the pub for 17 years. "I'm legally obliged to keep children safe on my premises and if the parents let their children run riot, the only answer is to not allow them in at all."Johansen initially tried banning children only after 5pm, but this interim measure failed to address the underlying issues. Despite online criticism framing him as the "baddie," he expresses sadness about the situation: "I'm a publican; I'm a people-person. It gives me no joy to ban anyone, but it's just not safe: parents don't control their children and our other customers were beginning to go elsewhere. I had no choice."The Kenton's decision reflects a growing trend among UK pubs seeking to differentiate themselves from establishments that "resemble soft play centres without the ball pit." While some welcome this shift, others view it as unwelcoming to families, creating a culture war in the pub industry.Lee Jones, landlord of the Brewers Arms in West Malvern, Worcestershire, reversed a previous child ban: "We're dog-friendly, child-friendly, adult-friendly. We're just friendly – we don't distinguish. Pubs are for the community and I don't see bans in the spirit of what we're here for." Jones reports that when children become rowdy, staff can address the issue with parents, though this is rarely needed.Stephen Boyd, who runs the Alma in south London, took a different approach after attempting to attract young families. He found families with children consumed disproportionate time and resources with special requests for diluted drinks, heated beverages, and customized meals, while adult customers waited longer for their orders."You just need a couple screaming, banging on a table or running up and down, and it dictates the whole atmosphere of the pub," Boyd says. "Parents would take massive umbrage if staff asked them to stop their children doing something." After implementing a child ban, he describes the change as "a fucking revelation" with staff retention improving and takings doubling.Despite the positive results, Boyd faced significant backlash: "I got a lot of online hate. Mainly from people who had never been to the pub but felt I was doing something morally hateful."Tom Stainer, chief executive of the Campaign for Real Ale, acknowledges the debate is "very live" but emphasizes: "But you do have to look at the responsibility of the parents in these situations, not just at the pubs. They're the ones responsible for making sure that their children behave."Financial considerations also drive some decisions. Mandy Keefe, landlady of the Wheel Inn in Ashford, banned children partly for behavioral reasons but also financial ones: "If a third of my Sunday customers were children eating from a reduced-rate child's menu and not drinking any alcohol, that wouldn't be financially viable."Across the UK, pubs are making individual decisions based on their specific circumstances, but as Johansen's experience demonstrates, it only takes one serious incident to settle the question for good.

National Savings and Investments (NS&I;) is preparing to make a significant payout to customers who have been affected by a savings scandal. The bank is expected to repay hundreds of millions of pounds to approximately 37,000 people whose money was misplaced due to historical failings.The government-backed savings institution is in discussions with the Treasury to compensate these customers, with the exact amount yet to be determined. This payout would not be considered compensation but rather a reimbursement for money that customers did not receive.The scandal involves reports of bereaved families not receiving money that was rightfully theirs, as well as complaints that NS&I; failed to pay out premium bond prizes to the families of deceased savers. The bank has apologized for the poor customer service, particularly during sensitive times.The pensions minister, Torsten Bell, is expected to address the issue in a statement to the House of Commons. NS&I; holds over £100bn for around 26 million customers and is one of the largest savings organizations in the UK. The bank recently faced criticism over the spiralling cost of its modernisation programme, which has risen from £1.3bn to £3bn.A spokesperson for NS&I; said: “We recognise that dealing with bereavement can be challenging and would like to apologise to anyone who has not received the customer service from NS&I; that they should expect, particularly at such a sensitive time.”

Anthropic, a leading artificial intelligence company, is set to face off against the US Pentagon in a San Francisco court over a ban that prevents the military from using its Claude AI model. The company refused to remove safety guardrails that prevent its AI from being used for fully autonomous weapons and mass domestic surveillance.The legal showdown began on Tuesday, with US District Judge Rita Lin presiding over the hearing. Anthropic argues that the Pentagon's move is an unprecedented and unlawful designation that violates freedom of speech protections and due process rights.The Pentagon-led ban was enacted after Anthropic refused to strip safety guardrails from its AI model. The company's designation as a national security supply chain risk prohibits anyone within the Defense Department or its contractors from using the technology.Legal experts believe that Anthropic is likely to prevail, pointing to a February 27 post on X in which Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said he is directing the DoD to designate Anthropic a Supply-Chain Risk to National Security. The post also said that contractors, suppliers, or partners for the United States military are prohibited from commercial activity with Anthropic.The White House has pushed back on Anthropic's claims that government action violated free speech protections under the First Amendment of the US Constitution, saying the dispute stems from contract negotiations and national security concerns rather than retaliation.Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts has penned a letter to Hegseth voicing her concerns, saying she is particularly concerned that the DoD is trying to strong-arm American companies into providing the Department with the tools to spy on American citizens and deploy fully autonomous weapons without adequate safeguards.

The V&A; Museum's lavish spring show, Schiaparelli: Fashion Becomes Art, is a surrealist's dream come true. The exhibition takes visitors on a journey through the life and work of Elsa Schiaparelli, a fashion designer who defied conventions and pushed the boundaries of art and fashion.Schiaparelli's designs are a whimsical and witty blend of art, culture, and fashion. From a shoe that becomes a hat to a telephone dial that transforms into a compact mirror, each piece is a testament to her innovative spirit and creative genius.The exhibition features collaborations with famous artists like Salvador Dalí and Jean Cocteau, showcasing iconic pieces such as the lobster telephone and the skeleton dress. These works demonstrate Schiaparelli's ability to merge fashion and art, creating something truly unique and groundbreaking.Elsa Schiaparelli was a trailblazer in her own right, launching her fashion career in Paris in the 1930s and quickly gaining recognition for her trompe l'oeil sweaters and shocking pink designs. Her legacy continues to inspire designers today, including Daniel Roseberry, who has been spearheading the brand's revival since 2019.The exhibition also features modern pieces that showcase the brand's continued commitment to innovative design and artistic collaboration. From a golden breastplate worn by Bella Hadid at Cannes to a robot baby made from old flip phones and circuit board shards, these works demonstrate the brand's ongoing dialogue with art and culture.Schiaparelli: Fashion Becomes Art is a must-see exhibition for anyone interested in fashion, art, and culture. It challenges visitors to think differently about the relationship between fashion and art, and showcases the enduring legacy of Elsa Schiaparelli's surrealist designs.

Brazil's women's blind football team has made a historic debut at the 2025 World Championships, finishing fourth and exceeding expectations. The team's captain, Eliane Gonçalves, scored the winning goal in their opening game against India. Gonçalves, who lost her sight due to a hereditary condition, credits sports for helping her cope with depression and finding a new perspective on life.The team's goalkeeper, Lígia Nogueira, was one of the few sighted players in the squad and had to learn new skills to adapt to blind football. Despite facing challenges, including a lack of domestic competitions and no payment for players, the team showed remarkable resilience and determination.Brazil's women's blind football team was officially established in 2025, 47 years after the men's national championships began. The delay is attributed to a combination of gender and disability prejudice, resulting in a lack of investment and organized competitions.The team's psychologist suggested a rallying cry, 'We are the first, but we will not be the last,' which has become a symbol of their journey. Gonçalves wants to keep going for as long as she can and leave the team more consolidated than she found it. Her message to anyone losing their sight is that 'sport is here to embrace us.' The team's success has raised hopes for the future of women's blind football, particularly with the Copa América coming to São Paulo in September 2026.

NASA has announced a significant shift in its lunar exploration strategy, cancelling plans for a lunar orbit space station known as Gateway. Instead, the agency will utilize the station's components to construct a $20bn base on the moon's surface over the next seven years.The decision was made by NASA's new chief, Jared Isaacman, who was sworn in at the agency in December. Isaacman outlined the changes to the agency's flagship moon program, Artemis, at an event at NASA's Washington headquarters."It should not really surprise anyone that we are pausing Gateway in its current form and focusing on infrastructure that supports sustained operations on the lunar surface," Isaacman told delegates at the event.The Lunar Gateway station, largely already built with contractors Northrop Grumman and Lanteris Space Systems, owned by Intuitive Machines, was meant to be a space station parked in a lunar orbit. Repurposing the craft for a lunar surface base is not simple, but Isaacman emphasized that the agency can repurpose equipment and international partner commitments to support surface and other program objectives.The changes imposed by Isaacman on the flagship US moon program in recent weeks are reshaping billions of dollars' worth of contracts under the Artemis effort, sending companies scrambling to accommodate the extra urgency as China makes progress toward its own 2030 moon landing.