Environment
May 27, 2026
Trump Administration's Plan to Destroy PFAS Deemed 'Nonsensical'
The Trump administration's plan to destroy PFAS, also known as 'forever chemicals,' has been critic…
The Flawed Plan to Destroy PFAS
The Trump administration's plan to ditch PFAS drinking water regulations and instead attempt to destroy 'forever chemicals' on a wide scale has been met with criticism from experts. The plan, which was announced by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), involves using technology to destroy PFAS, rather than implementing strong drinking water regulations.
The Problem with PFAS Destruction Technology
The problem with the Trump plan is that technology that fully destroys PFAS does not exist. While progress is being made in its development, it is unclear when – if ever – it may be deployed on an industrial scale. Current technologies used to destroy PFAS, from incineration to thermal oxidization, often fail to fully destroy a PFAS compound, instead essentially breaking it into smaller bits, or byproducts.
The Financial Impact of PFAS Destruction
The cost of removing PFAS from water can be as high as $18 million per pound.
The processes of destroying PFAS are extremely expensive.
Taxpayers shoulder most of the cost, and the powerful waste management industry gets paid.
The Impact on Public Health
Pfas are a class of at least 16,000 compounds most frequently used to make products water-, stain- and grease-resistant. They have been linked to cancer, birth defects, decreased immunity, high cholesterol, kidney disease and a range of other serious health problems. The solution is to 'turn off the tap' – reduce the production and use of PFAS – rather than attempting to destroy them after they have been released into the environment.
The Future of PFAS Regulation
Ultimately, PFAS destruction has all the same problems as carbon capture – it is inefficient, expensive, unreliable, prone to technical failures and clearly not an alternative to regulations. Experts argue that the focus should be on reducing the production and use of PFAS, rather than attempting to destroy them after they have been released into the environment.
#Trump Administration
#EPA
#PFAS
Read More