Breaking AI & Tech News Analyzed

Tyson Fury, the Gypsy King of boxing, has once again called out Anthony Joshua for a highly anticipated superfight, but the question remains: will it ever happen? The two British boxing legends have been talking about facing each other for over 10 years, but the bout has been plagued by delays, postponements, and cancellations. Following his dominant victory over Arslanbek Makhmudov at Tottenham Hotspur Stadium, Fury expressed his desire to fight Joshua next, stating, "I've no idea" if the fight will happen. Despite Joshua's presence ringside, he refused to give a definitive answer, citing the need for time to recover from a tragic car crash in Nigeria that claimed the lives of two of his close friends. Fury, who has been chasing Joshua for a decade, sounded perplexed by Joshua's evasive response. "He didn't give an answer," Fury said. "In my opinion, he didn't want no smoke. He didn't look like he wanted it. He was shell-shocked." Fury emphasized that he has given Joshua the respect and space he deserves, especially after his recent personal tragedy. Joshua, on the other hand, appeared dismissive, stating "Contracts are being sent over and you’ll probably see us in the ring next, more than likely." When asked if he needed a warm-up fight, Joshua quipped, "Good question. That [Fury] could be a warmup fight, based on what I saw tonight." Fury dismissed the suggestion that Joshua needed a proper test against a real boxer before stepping into the ring with him. "It’s another stumbling block. He’s just knocked a man spark out," Fury said. "I’ve just come off a win. Let’s get it on. He’s 36. I’m 37. What’s the holdup?" The two fighters have had a long and complicated history, with Fury noting, "If it ain’t Anthony Joshua next I’m not interested in boxing. I’ll eat a thousand Easter eggs, go up to 35 stone. I’m out. It’s either him or I’m gone again. I’m not interested in up-and-comers. I’m not interested in someone trying to prove a point over me. I don’t care about rankings or belts. I only care now about AJ. That’s the defining fight for British boxing."

Roberto De Zerbi arrived on the pitch barely half an hour before kick‑off, his black padded gilet pulled up to the neck against a biting Wearside wind. By the final whistle the chill had eased, but Tottenham’s morale had plummeted.Sunderland’s 1‑0 victory not only cemented the visitors’ place in the league’s bottom three, it also lifted Régis Le Bris’s side to 10th place with six matches left in the campaign.Facing his third managerial appointment in a single season, De Zerbi urged his squad to rediscover the high‑risk attacking ethos of former boss Ange Postecoglou – a vision that remained frustratingly out of reach on a day dominated by low‑tempo play.Long‑time Tottenham midfielder Antonin Kinsky made a rare return after his brief, infamous cameo in a 5‑2 Champions League loss to Atlético Madrid. His comeback was cut short when a second‑half head clash forced his substitution for the inexperienced Brandon Austin.Goalkeeper Guglielmo Vicario, still recovering from hernia surgery, was expected to be tested. Sunderland’s Granit Xhaka delivered a sharply inswinging corner, but Kinsky calmly palmed the ball over the bar, keeping Spurs in the game.A potential penalty for Tottenham was overturned after VAR review; replays showed Omar Alderete had won the ball cleanly, while Randal Kolo Muani’s appeal proved unfounded.Richarlison offered brief flashes of quality but failed to convert his chances, and Dutch striker Brian Brobbey – described as a “human bulldozer” – was unable to capitalise on Enzo Le Fée’s incisive passes, despite a lone fine save from the Sunderland keeper.De Zerbi’s frustration was palpable. After Dominic Solanke’s weak finish allowed Sunderland’s Robin Roefs to deny a golden‑chance in stoppage‑time, the manager pulled his gilet up over his eyes, perhaps to shield himself from the disappointment.Mid‑second‑half, former Paris Saint‑Germain defender Nordi Mukiele, back from injury, struck a 20‑yard shot that deflected off centre‑back Micky van de Ven. The ball’s change of direction left the goal‑mouth ambiguous, sparking a debate over whether the goal should be credited to Mukiele or recorded as an own‑goal.The match’s physical intensity escalated when Brobbey’s challenge led to a painful collision between Kinsky and Cristian Romero, forcing both players off – Romero in tears with a leg injury. De Zerbi also expressed anger that Brobbey, already booked, escaped a second yellow card.Despite a flurry of substitutions, Tottenham struggled to pose serious questions to Sunderland’s defence, leaving the club’s relegation hopes hanging by a thread as the season draws to its final stretch.

Birmingham City defeated Wrexham 2-0 at St Andrew’s, a result that pushes the Red Dragons further from the Championship playoff places. The loss leaves Wrexham four points behind sixth‑placed Hull City with only four games remaining.After a 5-1 drubbing by Southampton, the defeat marks Wrexham’s first back‑to‑back losses since August. Manager Phil Parkinson tried to steady the mood, saying, “We’ve had a tough week, but we’re not down and out yet. People may write us off, but inside the dressing room we’re still fighting.”Goals came from Carlos Vicente, who headed in his third goal for Birmingham since joining in January, and Christoph Klarer, who added a second‑half strike to seal the win.Wrexham’s attack was virtually silent – they failed to register a single shot on target, and goalkeeper James Beadle had little to do. In contrast, Birmingham’s keeper Arthur Okonkwo made several first‑half saves, keeping the hosts in control.The victory gave Birmingham their first win in over a month and lifted them to 15th place in the league table. The hosts dominated possession, forcing early saves from Okonkwo and creating chances for Ibrahim Osman and August Priske, though those early efforts were thwarted.In the second half, a well‑timed delivery from Kai Wagner allowed Vicente to rise highest at the far post and head home. Later, a corner from Paik Seung‑ho found Klarer, who muscled past Max Cleworth and finished confidently.Substitutes Josh Windass and Nathan Broadhead were introduced by Parkinson in a bid to spark Wrexham’s attack, but the visitors could not muster any meaningful threat in the final quarter.Birmingham manager Chris Davies praised his side’s performance: “We were excellent throughout. When the opposition doesn’t have a shot on your goal and you score two – we could have scored five – that’s everything.”

When a Toronto reader confessed to always using "please" and "thank you" with Alexa, the Guardian invited its audience to share their thoughts on the etiquette of speaking to artificial assistants.One camp warns against treating AI as sentient beings, arguing that these systems merely mimic social cues and that confusing imitation with reality can erode our language’s power to challenge dehumanisation. As User30000 put it, we should avoid both de‑humanising language toward people and humanising language toward machines.Conversely, several contributors argue that politeness serves as a useful human default. Lauk notes that courteous phrasing may reinforce positive behavioural cues for AI that learn from user input, while also keeping the speaker grounded in genuine social norms.From an ecological standpoint, extra words translate into measurable energy and water waste. Superspartan highlights that each unnecessary token adds processing load to already energy‑intensive models, and that the cumulative effect of polite phrasing across millions of daily interactions could be substantial.Academic research supports the idea that courteous language can improve AI performance. A linked study finds that polite prompts often elicit more helpful replies, treating modern models as "statistical parrots" that mirror the tone they receive. Yet Sam Altman has publicly estimated that responding to thank‑you notes costs OpenAI tens of millions of dollars, underscoring a tangible financial dimension to the debate.Some readers take a lighter view, extending politeness to elevators, SUVs and even low‑battery iPads, while others, like Martin from Dorset, argue that the practice protects the human soul rather than the machine.There is growing concern that habitual rudeness toward AI may spill over into real‑world interactions. Poridgeoates observes that younger users, who spend more time with technology than with people, risk weakening empathy and emotional‑intelligence muscles if they treat conversational agents dismissively.Louise adds that the way we speak to objects can shape broader social behaviour, especially where power imbalances exist. While AI itself may not feel insulted, the act of being rude can reinforce undesirable character traits in the speaker.Overall, the discussion reveals a split between those who see politeness as a harmless habit that can improve AI responses, and those who view it as an unnecessary drain on resources and a potential threat to human civility.

The rise of generative AI has sparked concerns about its impact on the art world. Artists are seeing their work stolen and used to train AI models without consent or compensation. This has led to a heated debate about the role of AI in creative industries and the need for regulation.In 2022, the author, an artist, first started to see knock-offs of their work generated by AI image generators. The tech industry's approach has been to move fast and break things, with little regard for the consequences. The author argues that this is the greatest art heist in history, with billions of images harvested from the internet without credit, compensation, or consent.The tech lords knew what they were doing, with venture capitalist Marc Andreessen claiming that enforcing copyright law would “kill” the entire industry. The industry's narrative of inevitability is a way of getting people to comply in advance. The author notes that people seemed utterly unprepared to question the impact of AI on creative industries.In response, journalist Marisa Mazria Katz and the author launched an open letter demanding to keep AI-generated images out of newsrooms. The letter attracted thousands of signatures from around the world. Other artists have fought back in more powerful ways, including a lawsuit against leading image-generation companies Midjourney and Stability AI.The author argues that the tech elite's anti-humanism is revealed in their attacks on art. They shun human interaction and its serendipities, annoyances, and joys. The author notes that friction is the basis of all pleasure and that learning to make art is also friction.The impact of AI on creative industries has been devastating, with many artists out of work and entry-level illustration gigs annihilated. The audience will have to get used to the fact that generative AI is a tool to discipline and eliminate the human worker. The author argues that this is sold as progress, but it is actually a dystopian future.The author draws parallels with the luddites, who fought against the “satanic mills” and were skilled artisans fighting for their way of life. Artists too are fighting for a way of life, and if they are too disorganised to triumph, that will be everyone’s loss. The author concludes that AI companies' scraping may have started with the work of illustrators, but it has grown to encompass everything else, including culture, education, sanity, and our very imaginations.

While reviewing his putting in the new player facility on Friday evening, Scottie Scheffler found himself drawn to the big‑screen coverage of Rory McIlroy’s round. The sight of McIlroy’s play sparked a shift in Scheffler’s mindset, and with 36 holes remaining he was 12 shots behind the leader but with nothing to lose.Seizing the moment, Scheffler produced a 65 (‑7), the best round of his Masters career. He carded five birdies and an eagle, turning a steady start of 70 and 74 into a decisive surge.His charge began on the long downhill 2nd, where an approach landed in the heart of the green and he sank a six‑foot putt for eagle. He continued the on‑fire stretch through the 7th, 8th and 9th, leaving the front nine five under par with putts of six, 14 and four feet respectively.The crowd swelled as his name lit up the leaderboards. By the time he reached Amen Corner, spectators were lining the fairways, and his 200‑yard tee‑shot on the 11th curled perfectly onto the green, stopping eight feet from the pin.At the 13th, a mis‑hit approach found a bunker, forcing a scramble for par – a rare blemish in an otherwise flawless round. He rebounded with a birdie on the 16th, while short‑range putts at 14 and 17 fell short, leaving him just a few inches from a potential record.When asked if the round could have been even lower, Scheffler responded sharply, yet admitted, “It definitely could have been lower.” He emphasized that he had executed the shots he needed, noting his iron play was “very sharp” and that he created ample scoring opportunities.After the round, Scheffler sat four shots back of the leader, a manageable gap given his momentum. He also reflected on the broader challenge of Augusta, citing the need to master the course, shifting conditions and personal nerves.

The U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) reported that the destroyers USS Frank E. Peterson and USS Michael Murphy "transited the Strait of Hormuz and operated in the Arabian Gulf" as part of a mission to clear sea mines allegedly laid by Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC).Admiral Brad Cooper hailed the operation as a turning point in the U.S.–Israeli campaign against Iran, saying the navy was establishing a "new passage" to restore safe commercial flow. Iran’s Khatam al‑Anbiya Central Headquarters immediately rejected the claim, stating that any vessel movement in the strait remains under the "Armed Forces of the Islamic Republic of Iran" and that the U.S. report is "strongly denied." The strait, a narrow chokepoint through which roughly 20% of the world’s oil and natural gas transits, has been a flashpoint since the February 28 U.S.–Israel attacks that prompted Iran to restrict passage to pre‑approved ships. The closure spiked global fuel prices and disrupted both commercial and military traffic. Analysts, such as Maria Sultan of the South Asian Strategic Stability Institute, argue that any U.S. navigation would require Tehran’s explicit permission, underscoring the strategic leverage Iran holds over the waterway. Simultaneously, senior delegations from the United States and Iran met in Islamabad for historic face‑to‑face talks—the highest‑level engagement since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The negotiations, sparked by a preliminary ceasefire announced earlier in the week, focus on contentious issues including Iran’s nuclear program, frozen assets, and the future of Israeli operations in Lebanon. Both parties acknowledge that control of the Strait of Hormuz remains a major point of disagreement. Iran has signaled willingness to temporarily reopen the channel for commercial shipping but insists on maintaining leverage, proposing tolls to compensate for war damages. The United States, however, deems continued Iranian control a "non‑starter." U.S. President Donald Trump used his Truth Social platform to assert that Iran is "losing big" and to downplay the strait’s importance to the United States relative to its allies, claiming the mine‑clearing effort benefits nations such as China, Japan, South Korea, France, and Germany. Al Jazeera’s on‑the‑ground correspondents noted that despite a "deficit of trust," negotiators are working late into the night to bridge gaps, though fundamental disagreements over the strait’s governance persist.

Lebanon is observing a period of mourning following a tragic incident where an Israeli strike resulted in the loss of several security forces personnel. The incident has sparked widespread grief and condemnation across the region. Details about the exact number of casualties and the circumstances surrounding the strike are still emerging. The Lebanese government and various international bodies have expressed their condolences to the families of the victims and called for restraint in the volatile region.

US Senator JD Vance recently held a significant meeting with the Prime Minister of Pakistan, ahead of crucial diplomatic talks with Iran. This development has sparked interest in potential shifts in international relations and cooperation between the involved nations.The meeting between Vance and the Pakistani PM comes at a critical juncture, as Iran is set to engage in diplomatic discussions. The nature and specifics of these talks have not been disclosed, but the timing and participants suggest a focus on regional stability and security concerns.The involvement of US Senator JD Vance, known for his active role in foreign policy discussions, underscores the strategic importance of these interactions. As diplomatic efforts continue, the international community remains attentive to any developments that could impact global politics and regional dynamics.